Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
Published on: January 6, 2011
Multisource Evaluation of Surgeon Behavior Is Associated With Malpractice Claims
Janaka Lagoo1, William R Berry1, Kate Miller1
1Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA.
Surgeon behavior, as measured by 360-degree reviews, is linked to malpractice claims. Improving teamwork and communication may reduce malpractice risk and enhance patient care quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical Professionalism
- Surgical Quality Improvement
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Malpractice claims are often linked to poor physician-patient relationships.
- Physician behaviors, assessed via 360-degree reviews, may reflect aspects of patient interaction.
- This study investigates the association between surgeon 360-degree feedback and malpractice history.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between surgeon 360-degree reviews and malpractice claims.
- To determine if specific surgeon behaviors are associated with an increased risk of malpractice.
Main Methods:
- 385 surgeons from 4 academic medical centers underwent 360-degree reviews.
- Data from 264 surgeons were matched with malpractice claims from 2000-2015.
- Regression analysis assessed the association between 23 behavioral items and malpractice claims.
Main Results:
- 48.1% of surgeons had at least one malpractice claim.
- Multiple positive and negative behaviors were significantly associated with malpractice risk (P < 0.05).
- Surgeons with the lowest scores in certain behavioral areas had a higher likelihood of claims.
Conclusions:
- Surgeon behavior, evaluated through 360-degree reviews, correlates with malpractice claims.
- Teamwork and communication are key factors in malpractice exposure.
- Identifying and modifying negative behaviors can mitigate malpractice risk and improve patient care.
More Related Videos
12:27Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
Published on: June 16, 2023
05:08Quantification of Drosophila melanogaster Grooming Behavior for Evaluation of Excessive Grooming Phenotypes
Published on: March 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
What is Behavior?
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification