Pseudoprogression and hyperprogression after checkpoint blockade

Qiaohong Wang1, Jingze Gao1, Xia Wu1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, PR China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai 200127, PR China.

Insights

Immune checkpoint inhibitors show promise in cancer treatment but can cause unusual responses like hyperprogression, a rapid tumor growth. Further research is needed to understand and identify this detrimental effect in patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer significant clinical benefits for various cancers.
  • Patient responses to ICIs are heterogeneous, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression.
  • Hyperprogression is a rare but rapid tumor progression after immunotherapy, posing a clinical challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing research on hyperprogression following immune checkpoint blockade.
  • To highlight the unknown aspects of hyperprogression, including its incidence, basis, and predictive biomarkers.
  • To identify areas requiring further investigation in hyperprogression.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor response.
  • Analysis of clinical data and research findings related to pseudoprogression and hyperprogression.
  • Synthesis of current knowledge on the mechanisms and identification of hyperprogression.

Main Results:

  • Pseudoprogression is increasingly understood, but hyperprogression remains largely uncharacterized.
  • The incidence, underlying mechanisms, and predictive biomarkers for hyperprogression are largely unknown.
  • Immune checkpoint blockade may detrimentally affect a small subset of patients, leading to hyperprogression.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate evaluation of ICI efficacy is crucial to avoid premature treatment withdrawal or prolonged ineffective therapy.
  • Further research is urgently needed to elucidate the incidence, basis, and identification of hyperprogression.
  • Understanding hyperprogression is essential for optimizing immunotherapy strategies and patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade01:29

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

The site of chemical communication between a motor neuron and a muscle fiber is called the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). The end of the motor neuron at the NMJ divides into a cluster of synaptic end bulbs. The cytoplasm of these bulbs consists of synaptic vesicles enclosing acetylcholine molecules, the principal neurotransmitter released at the NMJ. The region opposite the synaptic bulb that ends in the muscle fiber is called the motor end plate, which has acetylcholine receptors. Within the...
5.1K
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint02:19

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

The spindle assembly checkpoint is a molecular surveillance mechanism ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation during anaphase. The checkpoint monitors the completion of all the prerequisite steps before chromosome segregation to determine whether the segregation process should proceed or be delayed.
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
3.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.0K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.8K