Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Multiparametric MR Imaging to Predict Patient Survival
Ankur Pandey1, Pallavi Pandey1, Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh1
1From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Abstract:
Purpose To determine the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based tumor metrics for evaluation of response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Materials and Methods Ninety-four patients with unresectable ICCA underwent baseline and follow-up MR imaging after TACE and were followed up until death or end of study duration. Lesions were analyzed for anatomic (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] and tumor volume) and functional (viable tumor volume, viable tumor burden, and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) volumetric MR parameters by using semiautomatic software. Response was assessed by using changes in viable tumor volume by using modified RECIST (mRECIST)-derived thresholds (three-dimensional mRECIST), viable tumor burden, and ADC. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used. Results Tumor volume did not change after TACE (P = .07) whereas RECIST diameter showed a small change (-2.6%; P = .02). There was an increase in ADC (20.7%) and a decrease in viable tumor volume (-29.3%) and viable tumor burden (-29.1%; P < .001 for all). Higher overall survival was noted among responders by using thresholds of 25% increase in ADC, 66% decrease in viable tumor volume, and 50% decrease in viable tumor burden (log-rank test, P < .05). Hazard ratio for nonresponders by using ADC, three-dimensional mRECIST, and viable tumor burden at multivariable analysis was 2.9 (P = .004), 4.1 (P = .009), and 4.0 (P = .002), respectively. Survival differences were noted for patients who showed response by using all three parameters (ADC, three-dimensional mRECIST, and viable tumor burden) versus those who showed response by using either one or two of these parameters versus those who showed no response (P < .001). Conclusion Changes in volumetric ADC, viable tumor volume, and viable tumor burden at MR imaging provide prognostic information among patients with unresectable ICCA who undergo TACE. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

