Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference
Summary
Dual-task interference occurs not just from resource competition but also from outcome conflict between tasks. Task-relatedness significantly impacts performance, suggesting substantial interactions between concurrent cognitive processes.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Performance
Background:
- Traditional dual-task interference models focus on limited processing resources.
- An alternative explanation involves outcome conflict or 'crosstalk' between task processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference.
- To manipulate task relatedness to assess its impact on interference.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Concurrent search for names (boys vs. cities) in separate channels.
- Experiment 2: Concurrent search for letters and digits, manipulating nontarget category relatedness.
Main Results:
- Task interference increased when nontargets were related to the other task's target category.
- Between-category search was less efficient in dual tasks compared to single tasks due to confusability.
- Congruence of target presence/absence across channels affected performance.
Conclusions:
- Outcome conflict significantly contributes to dual-task interference.
- Task interactions, particularly due to category confusability, are crucial.
- Further research is needed to identify all sources of outcome conflict.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...

