Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Modeling Spontaneous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma mRCC in Mice Following Nephrectomy
Published on: April 29, 2014
[Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma - current status]
Marc-Oliver Grimm1, Susan Foller1
1Universitätsklinikum Jena, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Jena.
Abstract:
Systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has substantially changed during the last 2 years due to approval of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor Nivolumab (Opdivo®) and new multikinase inhibitors (Cabozantinib, Lenvatinib, Tivozanib). The german kidney tumor guideline strongly recommends Nivolumab and Cabozantinib as 2nd line treatments after prior VEGF targeted therapy. CheckMate 025, the prospective randomized trial which led to approval of Nivolumab demonstrated improved overall survival (26 month vs. 19.7 month; hazard ratio 0.73; p = 0.0006) and response rate (26 % vs. 5 %) as well as a favorable toxicity profile compared with Everolimus. Currently, numerous combinations with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are compared to Sunitinib as first line treatment of mRCC. Out of these CheckMate 214, a randomized phase-3 trial is the first to demonstrate a significant higher objective response rate (42 % vs. 27 %, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (Sunitinib 26.0 month, median for Nivo + Ipi has been not yet reached (28.2 - NR); Hazard ratio 0.63) for the combination of Nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antibody Ipilimumab in IMDC intermediate and high risk patients. Furthermore, CheckMate 214 shows better side effect profile and quality of life in patients receiving Nivolumab and Ipilimumab compared with Sunitinib. However, a considerable increase of immune related adverse events is associated with the immune combination therapy. Another randomized trial demonstrates improved progression-free survival for the combination of the PD-L1 inhibitor Atezolizumab and the VEGF antibody Bevacizumab in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors; this was found in all IMDC risk groups. Further phase-3 trials with "new" VEGFR-TKIs (Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Lenvatinib) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations are ongoing.In conclusion, the PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor Nivolumab will remain a standard treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after prior VEGF targeted therapy. Nivolumab in combination with Ipilimumab will become a standard 1st line option for patients with intermediate and high risk profile according to IMDC. Further data are required regarding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with Bevacizumab and VEGFR-TKIs, respectively, including overall survival and side effect profile.
Insights
Nivolumab is a standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after VEGF therapy. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a new first-line option for intermediate/high-risk mRCC patients, showing improved survival and response rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
Background:
- Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment has evolved with immune-checkpoint inhibitors like Nivolumab and multikinase inhibitors.
- Nivolumab and Cabozantinib are recommended as second-line treatments in Germany post-VEGF therapy.
- Previous trials established Nivolumab's efficacy in overall survival and response rates compared to Everolimus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nivolumab and Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in mRCC treatment.
- To compare combination immunotherapies with existing treatments like Sunitinib and Everolimus.
- To assess the role of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with other agents for mRCC.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from CheckMate 025 and CheckMate 214 randomized trials.
- Comparison of Nivolumab versus Everolimus for second-line mRCC treatment.
- Evaluation of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib as first-line therapy for mRCC.
Main Results:
- Nivolumab demonstrated improved overall survival and response rates versus Everolimus.
- The combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab showed significantly higher objective response rates and overall survival compared to Sunitinib in intermediate and high-risk patients.
- The combination therapy also offered a better side effect profile and quality of life than Sunitinib, despite increased immune-related adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Nivolumab remains a standard second-line treatment for mRCC after VEGF therapy.
- Nivolumab in combination with Ipilimumab is a promising first-line option for intermediate and high-risk mRCC patients.
- Further research is needed on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with Bevacizumab and VEGFR-TKIs, focusing on overall survival and safety.
More Related Videos
05:36Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
Electrical Current
Renal Corpuscle
Glomerulus: Structure and Function
The glomerulus is a tiny, intricate network of capillaries located at the beginning of the nephron. It's enveloped by the Bowman's capsule and receives its blood supply from an afferent arteriole, which divides into numerous...
Renal Clearance
Renal clearance refers to the volume of plasma cleared of a specific substance, such as creatinine, per unit of time. To measure clearance, urine samples are collected over a 24-hour period during each bladder voiding, followed by a single blood sample at the...