Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

2.0K
Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
2.0K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.4K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.4K
Formats for Nursing Documentation01:28

Formats for Nursing Documentation

2.1K
Nursing documentation encompasses various formats designed to capture precise patient data, facilitate communication among healthcare team members, and ensure comprehensive and accurate patient records. Let's explore each of these formats in detail:
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...
2.1K
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

367
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
367
Interpreting Run Charts01:25

Interpreting Run Charts

4.1K
Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...
4.1K
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.8K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Killip class at presentation and immediate versus staged multivessel PCI in patients with STEMI.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Invasive transvalvular flow rate to predict likely severe aortic valve stenosis with low-gradient and normal ejection fraction.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026
Same author

Impact of the invasively measured flow-gradient pattern on clinical outcomes and ventricular remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026
Same author

Impact of renal dysfunction on immediate versus staged revascularization of non-culprit lesions in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the randomized MULTISTARS AMI trial.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026
Same author

In-Hospital and 1-Year Outcomes of Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients with Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Treated with Rotational Atherectomy.

Cardiology and therapy·2026
Same author

Ten-Year Outcomes of Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
05:50

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure

Published on: March 12, 2020

14.7K

Performing and Interpreting Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Document.

Stephan Achenbach1, Tanja Rudolph2, Johannes Rieber3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

Interventional Cardiology (London, England)
|March 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements assess coronary artery blockages. Deferring revascularization is safe if FFR > 0.80, while FFR ≤ 0.80 improves outcomes with treatment.

Keywords:
Coronary artery stenosisadenosineangiographycoronary artery diseasefractional flow reserveischaemiarevascularisation

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
06:32

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats

Published on: June 28, 2019

8.5K
Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
06:39

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice

Published on: April 13, 2015

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
05:50

International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure

Published on: March 12, 2020

14.7K
Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
06:32

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats

Published on: June 28, 2019

8.5K
Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
06:39

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice

Published on: April 13, 2015

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is crucial for assessing coronary artery stenosis haemodynamic significance.
  • Guidelines suggest FFR use when non-invasive ischemia proof is absent.
  • FFR's prognostic impact is established in randomized trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize clinical evidence supporting FFR measurements.
  • To provide practical recommendations for FFR procedure performance and interpretation.
  • To address barriers hindering widespread clinical adoption of FFR.

Main Methods:

  • Review of randomized trials evaluating the prognostic impact of FFR.
  • Analysis of clinical data supporting the use of FFR.
  • Synthesis of recommendations for FFR procedure and interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Revascularization can be safely deferred in lesions with FFR > 0.80.
  • Revascularization of stenoses with FFR ≤ 0.80 significantly reduces event rates compared to medical treatment.
  • Exclusion of specific patient groups (e.g., left main, severe LVH) from major trials exists.

Conclusions:

  • FFR is a valuable tool for guiding revascularization decisions in coronary artery disease.
  • Addressing procedural and interpretational uncertainties can improve FFR's clinical utility.
  • Standardized recommendations can enhance the consistent application of FFR in practice.