Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
Susanne van de Hei1,2, Steven McKinstry1,3,4, George Bardsley1,4
1Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Objective:
To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold.
Design:
Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study.
Setting:
Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community.
Participants:
30 adult participants with symptoms of a common cold, presenting within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms.
Interventions:
Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 35 L/min of 100% humidified air at 41°C via high flow nasal cannulae, 2 hours per day for up to 5 days (rhinothermy), or vitamin C 250 mg daily for 5 days (control).
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was the proportion of screened candidates who were randomised. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of randomised participants who completed the study; modified Jackson scores from randomisation to 10 days after initiation of randomised regimen; time until feeling 'a lot better' compared with study entry; time until resolution of symptoms or symptom score at 10 days postrandomisation; proportion of organisms identified by PCR analysis of nasal swabs taken at baseline; the patterns of use of the rhinothermy device; estimated adherence of the control group; and rhinothermy device tolerability.
Results:
In all 30/79 (38%, 95% CI 27% to 50%) of potential participants screened for eligibility were randomised. Rhinothermy was well tolerated, and all randomised participants completed the study (100%, 95% CI 88% to 100%). The reduction from baseline in the modified Jackson score was greater with rhinothermy compared with control at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with the maximum difference at day 4 (-6.4, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.3). The substantial clinical benefit threshold for modified Jackson score was a 5-unit change.
Conclusions:
This study shows that an RCT of rhinothermy compared with low-dose vitamin C in the treatment of the common cold is feasible.
Trial Registration Number:
ACTRN12616000470493; Results.
Related Concept Videos
Common Ion Effect
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

