Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Gene Transfer for Ischemic Heart Failure in a Preclinical Model
Published on: May 15, 2011
A single-center observational study on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention for ischemic heart failure:
Zongtao Wang1, Lijun Jin, Wanxing Zhou
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, School of Clinical Medicine of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved cardiac function and survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF). PCI demonstrated better outcomes than medical treatment alone for these high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Optimal medical treatment is standard for coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF).
- The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to optimal medical treatment for CAD and HF requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of PCI on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in patients with CAD and HF receiving optimal medical treatment.
- To compare outcomes between PCI and optimal medical treatment alone.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study included 69 patients with CAD and HF.
- Patients received either optimal medical treatment alone (12 patients) or PCI (57 patients).
- Outcomes assessed included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and survival rates.
Main Results:
- PCI significantly improved LVEF compared to medical treatment alone after 3 months.
- Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were lower in the PCI group (19.3%) versus the medical treatment group (50%).
- PCI was associated with significantly better survival rates (P=.02) and a trend towards better survival with complete revascularization.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be an effective strategy for improving survival in patients with CAD and HF.
- PCI offers significant benefits in cardiac function and clinical outcomes when added to optimal medical treatment.
Abstract:
The effects of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in patients with confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF), on the basis of the optimal medical treatment recommended by current guidelines, remain to be determined.A cohort study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of PCI on the basis of optimal medical treatment in patients with CAD and HF. Patients who received PCI were subsequently grouped according to partial and complete revascularization (CR) depending on the PCI outcome. The primary outcome was defined as a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) also were compared.A total of 69 patients (12 who received medical treatment and 57 who received PCI) were included. Patients in the PCI group showed significantly improved LVEF (P < .001), but patients in the medical treatment group did not (P > .05) after 3 months of follow-up. MACEs occurred in 50% patients in the medical treatment group and 19.3% patients of the PCI group, with this difference almost reaching statistical significance (P = .06). Compared with patients who received medical therapy only, patients who received PCI experienced better survival (P = .02). Moreover, survival seemed to be better in patients who achieved CR with PCI of the coronary arteries than in those who had partial revascularization of the coronary arteries (P = .06).PCI may be effective for improving survival in patients with CAD and HF.
More Related Videos
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies