Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples
Published on: January 6, 2022
Two efficient methods for isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from entomopathogenic fungi
María G Serna-Domínguez1, Gilda Y Andrade-Michel1, Hugo C Arredondo-Bernal1
1Centro Nacional de Referencia de Control Biológico, Km 1.5 Carretera Tecomán-Estación FFCC, Col. Tepeyac, C.P. 28110 Tecomán, Colima, Mexico.
Abstract:
Conventional and commercial methods for isolation of nucleic acids are available for fungal samples including entomopathogenic fungi (EPF). However, there is not a unique optimal method for all organisms. The cell wall structure and the wide range of secondary metabolites of EPF can broadly interfere with the efficiency of the DNA extraction protocol. This study compares three commercial protocols: DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega), and Axygen™ Multisource Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen) and three conventional methods based on different buffers: SDS, CTAB/PVPP, and CTAB/β-mercaptoethanol versus three cell lysis procedures: liquid nitrogen homogenization and two bead-beating materials (i.e., tungsten-carbide and stainless-steel) for four representative species of EPF (i.e., Beauveria bassiana, Hirsutella citriformis, Isaria javanica, and Metarhizium anisopliae). Liquid nitrogen homogenization combined with DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (i.e., QN) or SDS buffer (i.e., SN) significantly improved the yield with a good purity (~1.8) and high integrity (>20,000 bp) of genomic DNA in contrast with other methods, also, these results were better when compared with the two bead-beating materials. The purified DNA was evaluated by PCR-based techniques: amplification of translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF) and two highly sensitive molecular markers (i.e., ISSR and AFLP) with reliable and reproducible results. Despite a variation in yield, purity, and integrity of extracted DNA across the four species of EPF with the different DNA extraction methods, the SN and QN protocols maintained a high-quality of DNA which is required for downstream molecular applications.
Insights
Optimizing DNA extraction from entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) is crucial. Liquid nitrogen homogenization with DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit or SDS buffer yielded high-quality genomic DNA, outperforming other methods for downstream molecular applications.
Area of Science:
- Mycology
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) possess complex cell walls and secondary metabolites that hinder DNA extraction.
- Existing commercial and conventional DNA isolation methods are not universally optimal for all fungal species.
- Efficient genomic DNA extraction is vital for molecular studies and applications involving EPF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of three commercial and three conventional DNA extraction methods for four EPF species.
- To evaluate the impact of different cell lysis procedures (liquid nitrogen homogenization, bead-beating) on DNA yield, purity, and integrity.
- To identify the optimal DNA extraction protocol for high-quality genomic DNA suitable for PCR-based analyses.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated three commercial kits (Qiagen DNeasy®, Promega Wizard®, Axygen™ Multisource) and three conventional buffers (SDS, CTAB/PVPP, CTAB/β-mercaptoethanol).
- Compared three cell lysis techniques: liquid nitrogen homogenization, tungsten-carbide bead-beating, and stainless-steel bead-beating.
- Tested protocols on four EPF species: Beauveria bassiana, Hirsutella citriformis, Isaria javanica, and Metarhizium anisopliae.
- Assessed DNA quality using PCR amplification of translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF) and molecular markers (ISSR, AFLP).
Main Results:
- Liquid nitrogen homogenization combined with either the DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (QN) or SDS buffer (SN) significantly improved DNA yield.
- The QN and SN methods produced genomic DNA with good purity (~1.8 A260/230) and high integrity (>20,000 bp).
- These lysis and buffer combinations outperformed bead-beating methods and other tested protocols.
- Purified DNA from SN and QN protocols yielded reliable and reproducible results in PCR-based analyses.
Conclusions:
- Liquid nitrogen homogenization coupled with DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit or SDS buffer provides a robust method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from EPF.
- The optimized SN and QN protocols ensure DNA suitable for various downstream molecular applications, despite inter-species variations.
- This study offers valuable insights for selecting efficient DNA extraction strategies in entomopathogenic fungi research.
More Related Videos
06:58Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Entomopathogenic Fungi in Wild Monochamus alternatus Populations for Biocontrol Applications in Forest Wood Borers
Published on: September 29, 2023
09:42Isolation and Selection of Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples and Evaluation of Fungal Virulence against Insect Pests
Published on: September 28, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Genomic DNA in Prokaryotes
Genomic Diversity in Bacteria
Although bacterial genomes are much...
Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition
DNA Isolation
DNA Isolation
Genomics