Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
Published on: November 1, 2007
Collaboration or negotiation: two ways of interacting suggest how shared thinking develops
Rebeca Mejía-Arauz1, Barbara Rogoff2, Andrew Dayton2
1ITESO University, Periférico Sur Manuel Gómez Morin 8585, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco 45604, Mexico.
Abstract:
This paper contrasts two ways that shared thinking can be conceptualized: as negotiation, where individuals join their separate ideas, or collaboration, as people mutually engage together in a unified process, as an ensemble. We argue that these paradigms are culturally based, with the negotiation model fitting within an assumption system of separate entities-an assumption system we believe to be common in psychology and in middle-class European American society-and the collaboration model fitting within a holistic worldview that appears to be common in Indigenous-heritage communities of the Americas. We discuss cultural differences in children's interactions-as negotiation or collaboration-that suggest how these distinct paradigms develop.
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Critical Thinking
Colleges and universities are...
Creative Thinking
Divergent thinking is the...
Magical Thinking
Critical Thinking I
Critical Thinking II

