Different visual development: norms for visual acuity in children with Down's syndrome

Asma Aa Zahidi1, Valldeflors Vinuela-Navarro1,2, J Margaret Woodhouse1

  • 1School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Insights

Children with Down syndrome have poorer vision than their peers. This study establishes visual acuity norms for this population, aiding early detection and intervention for visual development.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Children with Down syndrome exhibit poorer visual acuity compared to typically developing children.
  • Clinicians lack established visual norms for Down syndrome populations to identify atypical visual development.
  • Early identification of visual issues is crucial for intervention in children with Down syndrome.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish binocular visual acuity norms for children with Down syndrome.
  • To provide clinicians with data for differentiating normal from anomalous visual development in this group.
  • To highlight the visual disadvantage faced by children with Down syndrome.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional binocular visual acuity data from 159 children with Down syndrome (up to 12 years).
  • Inclusion of longitudinal data from nine children for a comprehensive age-range assessment.
  • Analysis of monocular acuity data from 69 children to assess inter-ocular differences and binocular summation.

Main Results:

  • Binocular visual acuity in children with Down syndrome was consistently poorer from age three, stabilizing around 0.25 logMAR by age four.
  • Inter-ocular acuity difference and binocular summation were found to be 0.06 logMAR.
  • These findings are comparable to values reported in children without Down syndrome.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides essential binocular acuity norms for eye-care practitioners treating children with Down syndrome.
  • It underscores the visual disadvantage experienced by children with Down syndrome compared to their peers.
  • Practitioners are urged to inform parents and educators about these visual differences, advocating for necessary classroom accommodations.
Abstract