Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization

Matthew F Daley1, Jo Ann Shoup2, Sophia R Newcomer2

  • 1Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colo; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.

Academic Pediatrics
|April 1, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Parental concerns link childhood immunizations to asthma. A survey found electronic health records accurately reflect vaccination status, but some asthma risk factors varied by vaccination group, impacting study design.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Health
  • Immunology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Parental concerns exist regarding potential links between childhood immunization schedules and increased risk of allergic disorders, such as asthma.
  • Accurate assessment of vaccination status and control for confounding factors are crucial for safety studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of electronic health records (EHRs) in reflecting children's vaccination status.
  • To assess whether common asthma risk factors differ across various vaccination statuses.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was administered to parents of children aged 19-35 months across four vaccination groups.
  • Data collected included parent-reported vaccination status and the presence of asthma risk factors.
  • Vaccination status was compared between parent reports and EHR data.

Main Results:

  • High agreement was observed between parent-reported and EHR-documented vaccination status (94.0% for no vaccines, 87.3% for fully vaccinated).
  • Most asthma risk factors did not significantly differ between vaccination groups.
  • However, aeroallergen sensitivity and breastfeeding practices showed significant differences across vaccination groups.

Conclusions:

  • Electronic health records demonstrate good accuracy for vaccination status, crucial for observational safety studies.
  • Careful consideration and control of potential confounding factors, like aeroallergen sensitivity and breastfeeding, are essential in studies examining immunization safety and asthma risk.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
858
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
425
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
527
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K