Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

68.6K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
68.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

270.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
270.3K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

65.9K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.9K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

89.4K
Scientific Laws
89.4K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

620
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
620
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

18.8K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
18.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating ExpandED: Evaluating the effectiveness of a serious game expansion pack in teaching health professional students about interprofessional care.

AEM education and training·2024
Same author

Parenting and Childbearing in Neurosurgical Residency: Perspectives from the United States and Canada.

Journal of surgical education·2023
Same author

The Brain Protein Atlas: A conglomerate of proteomics datasets of human neural tissue.

Proteomics·2022
Same author

Integrating morphologic and molecular histopathological features through whole slide image registration and deep learning.

Neuro-oncology advances·2022
Same author

Pathobiology, Diagnosis, and Current Biomarkers in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2022
Same author

Introducing Simulation-Based Learning for Trainees in Chronic Pain Medicine: Needs Assessment and Suggestions for Training Scenarios.

Medical science educator·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Multifractal Spectrum Analysis for Assessing Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy
05:24

Multifractal Spectrum Analysis for Assessing Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy

Published on: January 10, 2025

923

Benign and malignant scientific irreproducibility.

Clare Fiala1, Eleftherios P Diamandis2

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Clinical Biochemistry
|April 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Scientific irreproducibility hinders progress. This study proposes classifying irreproducibility by harm and advocates for mandatory author reflections on published work to improve research integrity and reduce errors.

More Related Videos

Three Dimensional Cultures: A Tool To Study Normal Acinar Architecture vs. Malignant Transformation Of Breast Cells
08:33

Three Dimensional Cultures: A Tool To Study Normal Acinar Architecture vs. Malignant Transformation Of Breast Cells

Published on: April 25, 2014

20.4K
Isolating Malignant and Non-Malignant B Cells from lck:eGFP Zebrafish
08:32

Isolating Malignant and Non-Malignant B Cells from lck:eGFP Zebrafish

Published on: February 22, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Multifractal Spectrum Analysis for Assessing Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy
05:24

Multifractal Spectrum Analysis for Assessing Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy

Published on: January 10, 2025

923
Three Dimensional Cultures: A Tool To Study Normal Acinar Architecture vs. Malignant Transformation Of Breast Cells
08:33

Three Dimensional Cultures: A Tool To Study Normal Acinar Architecture vs. Malignant Transformation Of Breast Cells

Published on: April 25, 2014

20.4K
Isolating Malignant and Non-Malignant B Cells from lck:eGFP Zebrafish
08:32

Isolating Malignant and Non-Malignant B Cells from lck:eGFP Zebrafish

Published on: February 22, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Research integrity
  • Biomedical research

Background:

  • Irreproducibility is a significant impediment to scientific advancement.
  • Existing challenges in addressing irreproducible research, particularly in high-impact publications.
  • A novel classification system for scientific irreproducibility is proposed, using a cancer analogy (benign, pre-malignant, malignant) to categorize deleteriousness.

Discussion:

  • Difficulties in challenging irreproducible findings, especially from prominent researchers or in prestigious journals.
  • The need for accountability and long-term evaluation of scientific contributions.
  • Proposing a framework for high-impact journals to solicit author reflections on reproducibility and relevance.

Key Insights:

  • A cancer-based analogy provides a framework for understanding the severity of scientific irreproducibility.
  • Mandatory post-publication reflections can incentivize greater researcher diligence.
  • Implementing author reflections could significantly decrease the incidence of irreproducible science.

Outlook:

  • Suggests a pilot study involving 100 papers from elite journals (2003-2008) to validate the proposed reflection system.
  • Aims to demonstrate the utility and necessity of long-term author accountability for research quality.
  • Anticipates that the prospect of future reporting will enhance researcher caution and improve overall scientific reproducibility.