Comparative conformational studies of 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-2-deoxyhex-1-enitols at the DFT level

B3LYP and M06-2X optimization and MP2 single point calculations are reported for the ⁴H₅ and ⁵H₄ conformations of 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-allal, 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal, 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal, and 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-gulal. Significant discrepancies in predictions of relative energies and conformers' population for B3LYP and M06-2X optimized geometries are observed. Generally, B3LYP overestimates the conformers' energies with respect to MP2, whereas M06-2X slightly underestimates the conformers' energies. B3LYP failed to estimate the ⁴H₅⇄⁵H₄ conformational equilibrium for 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal and 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal. The M06-2X functional showed good agreement with experimental results for all glycals studied. The ⁴H₅⇄⁵H₄ conformational equilibrium for 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-allal and 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-gulal is governed by the vinylogous anomeric effect (VAE), whereas competition between the VAE and quasi 1,3-diaxial interactions influence this equilibrium for 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal and 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal. The orientation of the 4-OAc group influences the strength of the quasi 1,3-diaxial interactions between the 3-OAc and 5-CH₂OAc groups. AIM analysis shows weak bonding interaction between the 3-OAc and 5-CH₂OAc groups.