Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Local versus general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization: a randomized study.

H B Peterson1, J F Hulka, F J Spielman

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|December 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multicity HIV seroprevalence in street youth, Ukraine.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2010
Same author

Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2007
Same author

Progestin and estrogen potency of combination oral contraceptives and endometrial cancer risk.

Gynecologic oncology·2006
Same author

Anaphylactoid reaction to intravenous sodium ferric gluconate complex during pregnancy.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2005
Same author

Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology.

British journal of cancer·2005
Same author

Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003

Local anesthesia offers comparable satisfaction to general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization, with shorter recovery times and fewer cardiovascular complications. This study provides evidence for its safety and acceptability in gynecological procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Anesthesiology
  • Surgical Procedures

Background:

  • Local anesthesia is suggested as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization.
  • No randomized studies have previously compared these anesthetic techniques for this procedure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and acceptability of local versus general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization.

Main Methods:

  • 100 women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization were randomly assigned to local or general anesthesia.
  • Procedures included bipolar electrocoagulation or spring clip application.

Main Results:

  • Local anesthesia group had shorter anesthesia (30 vs. 36 min) and recovery times (65 vs. 78 min).

Related Experiment Videos

  • General anesthesia was associated with higher likelihood of elevated blood pressure and heart rate.
  • Patient movement was a concern with general anesthesia, but not local anesthesia.
  • 80% of women in both groups were satisfied with their anesthetic technique.

    • Conclusions:

    • Local anesthesia is a safe and acceptable alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic sterilization.
    • Local anesthesia may lead to improved patient outcomes, including shorter recovery.
    • Further research may explore optimal patient selection for local anesthesia in gynecological surgery.