Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

A Murine Ommaya Xenograft Model to Study Direct-Targeted Therapy of Leptomeningeal Disease
Published on: January 29, 2021
Response to ERBB3-Directed Targeted Therapy in NRG1-Rearranged Cancers
Alexander Drilon1,2, Romel Somwar3, Biju P Mangatt4
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. drilona@mskcc.org.
Abstract:
NRG1 rearrangements are oncogenic drivers that are enriched in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMA) of the lung. The oncoprotein binds ERBB3-ERBB2 heterodimers and activates downstream signaling, supporting a therapeutic paradigm of ERBB3/ERBB2 inhibition. As proof of concept, a durable response was achieved with anti-ERBB3 mAb therapy (GSK2849330) in an exceptional responder with an NRG1-rearranged IMA on a phase I trial (NCT01966445). In contrast, response was not achieved with anti-ERBB2 therapy (afatinib) in four patients with NRG1-rearranged IMA (including the index patient post-GSK2849330). Although in vitro data supported the use of either ERBB3 or ERBB2 inhibition, these clinical results were consistent with more profound antitumor activity and downstream signaling inhibition with anti-ERBB3 versus anti-ERBB2 therapy in an NRG1-rearranged patient-derived xenograft model. Analysis of 8,984 and 17,485 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas and MSK-IMPACT datasets, respectively, identified NRG1 rearrangements with novel fusion partners in multiple histologies, including breast, head and neck, renal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and uterine cancers.Significance: This series highlights the utility of ERBB3 inhibition as a novel treatment paradigm for NRG1-rearranged cancers. In addition, it provides preliminary evidence that ERBB3 inhibition may be more optimal than ERBB2 inhibition. The identification of NRG1 rearrangements across various solid tumors supports a basket trial approach to drug development. Cancer Discov; 8(6); 686-95. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Wilson and Politi, p. 676This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 663.
Insights
NRG1 rearrangements drive cancer. ERBB3 inhibition shows promise for NRG1-rearranged cancers, potentially outperforming ERBB2 inhibition. This suggests new therapeutic strategies and basket trials for various solid tumors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- NRG1 rearrangements are oncogenic drivers found in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMA) of the lung.
- The NRG1 oncoprotein activates downstream signaling by binding ERBB3-ERBB2 heterodimers.
- This supports a therapeutic strategy targeting ERBB3 and ERBB2.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ERBB3 and ERBB2 inhibition in NRG1-rearranged cancers.
- To explore the potential of ERBB3 inhibition as a novel treatment paradigm.
- To identify the presence of NRG1 rearrangements in diverse cancer types.
Main Methods:
- Clinical trial analysis of anti-ERBB3 (GSK2849330) and anti-ERBB2 (afatinib) therapies in patients with NRG1-rearranged IMA.
- In vitro studies and patient-derived xenograft models to compare ERBB3 and ERBB2 inhibition.
- Genomic data analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas and MSK-IMPACT datasets to identify NRG1 rearrangements.
Main Results:
- A durable response was observed with anti-ERBB3 therapy in an exceptional responder with NRG1-rearranged IMA.
- Anti-ERBB2 therapy (afatinib) did not achieve response in four patients with NRG1-rearranged IMA.
- NRG1 rearrangements were identified in multiple cancer types, including breast, lung, and pancreatic cancers.
Conclusions:
- ERBB3 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for NRG1-rearranged cancers.
- ERBB3 inhibition may be more effective than ERBB2 inhibition in this context.
- The broad occurrence of NRG1 rearrangements supports basket trial designs for drug development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
[3,3] Sigmatropic Rearrangement of 1,5-Dienes: Cope Rearrangement
Target Cell Response to Hormones
Notably, the cellular response can be regulated by altering the number of receptors expressed in the cell. For example, prolonged exposure to elevated hormone levels results in a gradual decline or down-regulation in the number of receptors for that specific hormone on the cell surface. Conversely, in response to low hormone levels, cells may use up-regulation, producing an...
[3,3] Sigmatropic Rearrangement of Allyl Vinyl Ethers: Claisen Rearrangement
Preparation of Diols and Pinacol Rearrangement
The reaction begins with transferring a proton from the acid catalyst to one of the hydroxyl groups, producing an oxonium ion.

