Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Using differential item functioning to evaluate potential bias in a high stakes postgraduate knowledge based
David Hope1, Karen Adamson2, I C McManus3
1Centre for Medical Education, The Chancellor's Building, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4SB, UK. david.hope@ed.ac.uk.
Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis of a postgraduate internal medicine exam found few unfair questions. This suggests that group performance differences are not due to biased assessment items.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Psychometrics
- Health Professions Education
Background:
- Fairness in assessment is crucial for defensible evaluations, ensuring candidates perform based on ability, not background.
- Performance disparities across demographic groups (ethnicity, sex) are observed in many assessments.
- Routine analysis of examinations, including Differential Item Functioning (DIF), is necessary to identify and address potential progression barriers for specific groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate assessment fairness using DIF for an international postgraduate examination in internal medicine.
- To identify specific questions exhibiting bias between ethnically white and non-white UK graduates, and between male and female UK graduates.
Main Methods:
- Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis was applied to 2773 questions across 14 sittings of a summative postgraduate examination.
- The study included 13,694 candidates, comparing ethnically white UK graduates with ethnically non-white UK graduates, and male UK graduates with female UK graduates.
Main Results:
- Only eight out of 2773 questions (0.29%) showed notable DIF after correction for multiple comparisons.
- A panel of blinded clinician assessors found no plausible explanations for the DIF in these identified questions.
- The identified questions did not significantly impact overall cohort performance, and group performance differences were not explained by these unfair questions.
Conclusions:
- Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is a valuable tool for exploring assessment fairness at the question level, particularly in high-stakes examinations.
- The study found very few questions with notable DIF, indicating that group-level performance differences in this examination are not attributable to unfairness in individual assessment items.
- The findings suggest that broader factors beyond individual question bias likely contribute to observed disparities in passing rates between demographic groups.
More Related Videos
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
10:13Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
Published on: February 14, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Field Procedure for Staking Out Curves
Correspondence Bias
Self-Serving Bias