Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids02:26

Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids

55.6K
Particles in a solid are tightly packed together (fixed shape) and often arranged in a regular pattern; in a liquid, they are close together with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape); in a gas, they are far apart with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape). Particles in a solid vibrate about fixed positions (cannot flow) and do not generally move in relation to one another; in a liquid, they move past each other (can flow) but remain in essentially constant contact; in a gas, they move...
55.6K
Energy Bands in Solids01:01

Energy Bands in Solids

2.0K
Isolated atoms have discrete energy levels that are well described by the Bohr model. And, it quantifies the energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom as En. Higher quantum numbers 'n' yield less negative, closer electron energy levels.
 Band Formation:
When atoms are brought close together, as in a solid, these discrete energy levels begin to split due to the overlap of electron orbitals from adjacent atoms. This split occurs because of the Pauli exclusion principle, which states...
2.0K
Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids00:51

Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids

4.0K
Most solids and liquids are incompressible—their densities remain constant throughout. In the presence of an external force, the molecules tend to restore to their original positions, which is only possible because the constituents interact. The interactions help the constituents pass on information about external disturbances, like sound waves. Therefore, sound waves travel faster through these media. Compared to solids, the constituents in a liquid are less tightly bound. Thus, sound...
4.0K
Molecular and Ionic Solids02:54

Molecular and Ionic Solids

20.3K
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
20.3K
Metallic Solids02:37

Metallic Solids

20.9K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
20.9K
Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

18.4K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
18.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emerging Electronic Nose Design for Breath-Based Cancer Diagnostics: Advances in Machine Learning Approaches and Sensor Architecture Design.

ACS sensors·2026
Same author

Balancing Transport-Accessible Catalytic Interfaces and Li<sup>+</sup> Transport via Porosity Engineering for High-Performance Li-S Batteries.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

Spectroelectrochemical insight into copper cobalt catalysts for CO<sub>2</sub> and nitrite co-electroreduction to urea.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Self-Accelerating Drops on Silicone-Based Super Liquid-Repellent Surfaces.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

Metal Oxide-Metal Organic Framework Layers for Discrimination of Multiple Gases Employing Machine Learning Algorithms.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Environmentally Friendly and Earth-Abundant Self-Healing Electrocatalyst Systems for Durable and Efficient Acidic Water Splitting.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs
09:09

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs

Published on: January 10, 2019

8.3K

Cassie-Levitated Droplets for Distortion-Free Low-Energy Solid-Liquid Interactions.

William S Y Wong1, Antonio Tricoli1

  • 1Nanotechnology Research Laboratory, Research School of Engineering , The Australian National University , Canberra , ACT 2601 , Australia.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|April 5, 2018
PubMed
Summary

A new Cassie-levitating droplet model accurately assesses interactions on superomniphobic surfaces. This method overcomes limitations of the pendant droplet model, providing distortion-free wetting property analysis for advanced material engineering.

Keywords:
Bashforth−Adams profileCassie-levitateddistortion-freependant dropletsuperamphiphobicity

More Related Videos

High Throughput Analysis of Liquid Droplet Impacts
09:00

High Throughput Analysis of Liquid Droplet Impacts

Published on: March 6, 2020

7.0K
Quantification of Cellular Densities and Antigenic Properties using Magnetic Levitation
05:25

Quantification of Cellular Densities and Antigenic Properties using Magnetic Levitation

Published on: May 17, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs
09:09

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs

Published on: January 10, 2019

8.3K
High Throughput Analysis of Liquid Droplet Impacts
09:00

High Throughput Analysis of Liquid Droplet Impacts

Published on: March 6, 2020

7.0K
Quantification of Cellular Densities and Antigenic Properties using Magnetic Levitation
05:25

Quantification of Cellular Densities and Antigenic Properties using Magnetic Levitation

Published on: May 17, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Surface Chemistry
  • Fluid Dynamics

Background:

  • Superomniphobic materials exhibit unique wetting properties due to their low surface energy interfaces.
  • Existing methods like the pendant droplet model struggle with accurate characterization of these surfaces, leading to distorted droplet profiles.
  • Ultralow-energy interactions on superomniphobic surfaces require advanced investigation techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel Cassie-levitating droplet model for characterizing superomniphobic materials.
  • To overcome the limitations of traditional pendant droplet methods in assessing wetting properties.
  • To enable distortion-free analysis of liquid-surface interactions on superomniphobic interfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Cassie-levitating droplet model.
  • Comparative analysis using both Cassie-levitating and pendant droplet models on superamphiphobic surfaces with low surface tension fluids (e.g., hexadecane).
  • Theoretical framework to quantify droplet profile distortions against ideal shapes during dynamic cycles.

Main Results:

  • The Cassie-levitating model provides distortion-free assessment of wetting properties, unlike the pendant droplet model.
  • Significant deviations (up to 70° or 800%) in contact angle hysteresis were observed between the two models.
  • Pendant droplets showed up to 50% distortion, while Cassie-levitating droplets exhibited less than 10% distortion.

Conclusions:

  • The Cassie-levitating droplet model is a superior method for characterizing superomniphobic materials and their interactions with low surface tension liquids.
  • This new model overcomes critical limitations of existing techniques, enabling accurate contact angle hysteresis measurements.
  • The findings pave the way for the future engineering and application of advanced superomniphobic materials.