Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Evaluating the process and outcomes of child death review in the Solomon Islands
Mathew Sandakabatu1, Titus Nasi1, Carol Titiulu1
1Department of Paediatrics, Honiara National Referral Hospital, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Insights
Child death auditing in low-resource settings can identify preventable deaths. However, implementing recommended changes requires a dedicated quality improvement team and sustained effort for meaningful practice improvements.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Paediatric Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Maternal and perinatal mortality auditing is promoted globally, but child death auditing is under-evaluated in low/middle-income countries.
- A standardized child death review process was implemented in the National Hospital, Honiara, Solomon Islands in 2017.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the process and outcomes of a standardized child death review system.
- To assess the feasibility and challenges of child death auditing in a resource-limited setting.
Main Methods:
- Systematic observations of weekly child death review meetings over 6 months.
- Evaluation against adapted World Health Organization (WHO) tools, audit cycle stages, paediatric audit principles, and national clinical standards.
- Review of 66 neonatal and child deaths across 33 meetings.
Main Results:
- The child death auditing process showed satisfactory elements but identified areas for improvement.
- Key areas for enhancement include systematic cause-of-death classification, inclusion of social/community factors, and improved action plan follow-up.
- Identified gaps in communication, clinical care, diagnostics, and essential equipment for neonatal and paediatric high-dependency care.
Conclusions:
- Child death auditing is feasible in resource-limited settings and highlights preventable death factors.
- Translating audit data into practice changes is the primary challenge, necessitating a quality improvement team.
- Effective auditing requires structure, tools, evaluation, and integration into hospital culture for continuous quality improvement.
Abstract:
While maternal and perinatal mortality auditing has been strongly promoted by the World Health Organization (WHO), there has been very limited promotion or evaluation of child death auditing in low/middle-income settings. In 2017, a standardised child death review process was introduced in the paediatric department of the National Hospital in Honiara, Solomon Islands. We evaluated the process and outcomes of child death reviews. The child death auditing process was assessed through systematic observations made at each of the weekly meetings using the following standards for evaluation: (1) adapted WHO tools for paediatric auditing; (2) the five stages of the audit cycle; (3) published principles of paediatric audit; and (4) WHO and Solomon Islands national clinical standards of Hospital Care for Children. Thirty-three child death review meetings were conducted over 6 months, reviewing 66 neonatal and child deaths. Some areas of the process were satisfactory and other areas were identified for improvement. The latter included use of a more systematic classification of causes of death, inclusion of social risk factors and community problems in the modifiable factors and more follow-up with implementation of action plans. Areas for improvement were in communication, clinical assessment and treatment, availability of laboratory tests, antenatal clinic attendance and equipment for high dependency neonatal and paediatric care. Many of the changes recommended by audit require a quality improvement team to implement. Child death auditing can be done in resource-limited settings and yield useful information of gaps which are linked to preventable deaths; however, using the data to produce meaningful changes in practice is the greatest challenge. Audit is an iterative and evolving process that needs a structure, tools, evaluation, and needs to be embedded in the culture of a hospital as part of overall quality improvement, and requires a quality improvement team to follow-up and implement action plans.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

