Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementing paediatric early warning scores systems in the Netherlands: future implications
J F de Groot1, N Damen2, E de Loos3
1NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, the Netherlands. j.degroot@nivel.nl.
Insights
Paediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) implementation improved patient record use, but staff doubts about effectiveness and the lack of national guidelines hinder full adoption. A national PEWS system is recommended for better patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care
- Health services research
- Patient safety
Background:
- Paediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) are vital for identifying and managing clinical deterioration in children.
- The Dutch Ministry of Health mandated PEWS implementation in 2011 to enhance patient safety in pediatric wards.
- This study evaluated PEWS implementation outcomes and healthcare professionals' perspectives in Dutch non-university hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of implementing PEWS systems in Dutch non-university hospitals.
- To understand healthcare professionals' attitudes and experiences with PEWS systems.
- To identify challenges and facilitators for successful PEWS integration into clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative data collected via retrospective patient record review (n=554) at three time points.
- Semi-structured interviews (n=8) with healthcare professionals to explore implementation experiences.
- Inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.
Main Results:
- Significant increase in PEWS recording (69.2%) after 1 year, with appropriate action taken in 49.1% of elevated cases.
- Varied PEWS parameters and policies across hospitals; no system in place at baseline.
- Professionals acknowledged PEWS importance but expressed concerns about validity and effectiveness; integration into electronic records facilitated use.
Conclusions:
- Hospitals demonstrated improved PEWS utilization, though success varied.
- Staff concerns regarding PEWS validity, effectiveness, and inter-hospital communication pose challenges to sustained implementation.
- Development of a national PEWS system with a core set of parameters, cut-off points, and interventions is recommended.
Background:
Paediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) are increasingly being used for early identification and management of clinical deterioration in paediatric patients. A PEWS system includes scores, cut-off points and appropriate early intervention. In 2011, The Dutch Ministry of Health advised hospitals to implement a PEWS system in order to improve patient safety in paediatric wards. The objective of this study was to examine the results of implementation of PEWS systems and to gain insight into the attitudes of professionals towards using a PEWS system in Dutch non-university hospitals.
Methods:
Quantitative data were gathered at start, midway and at the end of the implementation period through retrospective patient record review (n = 554). Semi-structured interviews with professionals (n = 8) were used to gain insight in the implementation process and experiences. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using an inductive approach.
Results:
Looking at PEWS systems of the five participating hospitals, different parameters and policies were found. While all hospitals included heart rate and respiratory rate, other variables differed among hospitals. At baseline, none of the hospitals used a PEWS system. After 1 year, PEWS were recorded in 69.2% of the patient records and elevated PEWS resulted in appropriate action in 49.1%. Three themes emerged from the interviews: 1) while the importance of using a PEWS system was acknowledged, professionals voiced some doubts about the effectiveness and validity of their PEWS system 2) registering PEWS required little extra effort and was facilitated by PEWS being integrated into the electronic patient record 3) Without a national PEWS system or guidelines, hospitals found it difficult to identify a suitable PEWS system for their setting. Existing systems were not always considered applicable in a non-university setting.
Conclusions:
After 1 year, hospitals showed improvements in the use of their PEWS system, although some were decidedly more successful than others. Doubts among staff about validity, effectiveness and communication with other hospitals during transfer to higher level care hospital might hinder sustainable implementation. For these purposes the development of a national PEWS system is recommended, consisting of a "core set" of PEWS, cut-off points and associated early intervention.
More Related Videos
06:16An Experimental Approach to Investigating Effects of Artificial Light at Night on Free-Ranging Animals: Implementation, Results, and Directions for Future Research
Published on: February 2, 2022
09:34Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
z Scores and Unusual Values
This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
Second Order systems II