Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

591
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
591
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

590
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
590
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving01:16

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving

515
Consider a lawn roller with a mass of 100 kg, a radius of 0.2 meters, and a radius of gyration of 0.15 meters. A force of 200 N is applied to this roller, angled at 60 degrees from the horizontal plane. What will be the angular acceleration of the lawn roller?
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...
515
Projectile Motion: Example01:18

Projectile Motion: Example

13.8K
The theory of projectile motion is very useful for players of several sports to improve their performance. For example, a javelin thrower needs to throw their javelin in such a way that it travels as far as possible. The javelin thrower takes a short run-up to increase the initial speed of the javelin. The range of a projectile is at its maximum at a 45° angle so javelin throwers try to angle their throw as close to 45° as possible.
When we speak of the range (R) of a projectile on...
13.8K
Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion01:42

Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion

5.7K
While simple harmonic motion and uniform circular motion may be two separate concepts, they correlate and interlink with each other. Simple harmonic motion is an oscillatory motion in a system where the net force can be described by Hooke's law, while uniform circular motion is the motion of an object in a circular path at constant speed.
There is an easy way to produce simple harmonic motion by using uniform circular motion. For instance, consider a ball attached to a uniformly rotating...
5.7K
Torque Free Motion01:15

Torque Free Motion

849
The torque-free motion refers to the movement of a rigid body in space when no external torques are acting upon it. This type of motion can be observed in environments where there are no external forces or frictions, like in outer space. For example, a rotation of Mars in space is a torque-free motion. Mars is an axisymmetric object, meaning it has an axis of symmetry along which it rotates, designated as the z-axis. The rotating frame of reference is defined such that the center of mass of...
849

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Common Factors in Visual Illusions: A Review.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Silver bullets and sensory horizons.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Examining the relationship between ssVEP and psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity, grating acuity, and orientation discrimination.

iScience·2026
Same author

Object Detection, Recognition, Deep Learning, and the Universal Law of Generalization.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

How Are Grouping and Interference Related in Crowding?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
08:57

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.4K

Unconscious retinotopic motion processing affects non-retinotopic motion perception.

Marc M Lauffs1, Oh-Hyeon Choung2, Haluk Öğmen3

  • 1École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Brain Mind Institute, Laboratory of Psychophysics, EPFL SV BMI LPSY, Station 19, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: http://lpsy.epfl.ch.

Consciousness and Cognition
|April 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Invisible visual motion can influence conscious perception, even when the motion itself is not consciously perceived. This study shows that unseen retinotopic motion significantly degrades perceived non-retinotopic motion, challenging early visual suppression theories.

Keywords:
Ambiguous figuresConsciousnessInvisibilityNon-retinotopic processing

More Related Videos

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

561
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
08:57

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.4K
Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

561
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Unconscious visual stimuli, such as invisible primes or ambiguous figures, can impact conscious perception.
  • Invisibility is often attributed to early retinotopic suppression, but an alternative view links it to Gestalt object organization principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of Gestalt principles in visual motion perception.
  • To determine if invisible retinotopic motion can influence conscious non-retinotopic motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified Ternus-Pikler display to create a scenario where retinotopic motion is invisible and non-retinotopic motion is perceived.
  • Assessed the impact of the invisible retinotopic motion on the conscious perception of non-retinotopic motion.

Main Results:

  • The invisible retinotopic motion significantly degraded the conscious perception of non-retinotopic motion.
  • This effect could not be explained by inhibition within early retinotopic processing stages.

Conclusions:

  • Visual invisibility is closely linked to object-based (Gestalt) organization, not solely early retinotopic suppression.
  • Unconscious motion processing can interfere with conscious perception in ways not predicted by traditional models.