Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.9K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.9K
Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides01:20

Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides

252
Aminoglycosides are a class of antibiotics used to treat various bacterial infections. Clinicians must determine the elimination rate constant (k) and volume of distribution (VD) to optimize therapeutic efficacy and minimize toxicity. The k value represents the rate at which the drug is removed from the body, and the VD reflects the degree to which the drug distributes into body tissues. Accurately estimating these parameters allows healthcare professionals to tailor drug dosing to individual...
252
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

8.0K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
8.0K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.4K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.4K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.7K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.7K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk Analysis Implications of Dose-Response Thresholds for NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Diseases: Respirable Crystalline Silica and Lung Cancer as an Example.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2019
Same author

Socioeconomic and particulate air pollution correlates of heart disease risk.

Environmental research·2018
Same author

Biological mechanisms of non-linear dose-response for respirable mineral fibers.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2018
Same author

Applying Nonparametric Methods to Analyses of Short-Term Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Hospital Admissions for Cardiovascular Diseases among Older Adults.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2017
Same author

Do causal concentration-response functions exist? A critical review of associational and causal relations between fine particulate matter and mortality.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2017
Same author

Socioeconomic and air pollution correlates of adult asthma, heart attack, and stroke risks in the United States, 2010-2013.

Environmental research·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees
10:35

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees

Published on: November 15, 2017

9.6K

Effects of exposure estimation errors on estimated exposure-response relations for PM2.5.

Louis Anthony Tony Cox1

  • 1Cox Associates and University of Colorado, 503 N. Franklin Street, Denver, CO 80218, USA.

Environmental Research
|April 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Investigating fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure, this study reveals that estimation errors can obscure true health risk thresholds. Reducing PM2.5 may not yield expected health benefits if these errors are ignored.

Keywords:
Concentration-response functionDose-response thresholdExposure measurement errorFine particulate matterPM2.5

More Related Videos

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

16.3K
Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
10:44

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System

Published on: May 24, 2017

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees
10:35

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees

Published on: November 15, 2017

9.6K
Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

16.3K
Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
10:44

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System

Published on: May 24, 2017

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health Sciences
  • Epidemiology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Reported associations link fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure to numerous adverse outcomes.
  • Reducing PM2.5 is often advocated to mitigate these health risks.
  • However, some studies show minimal impact on mortality rates despite significant exposure-response associations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if ignored estimation errors in exposure concentrations explain the disconnect between PM2.5 association and causation.
  • To examine the impact of exposure estimation errors on concentration-response (C-R) functions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized EPA air quality monitor data from Los Angeles, California.
  • Modeled PM2.5 C-R functions assuming true functions are step functions with thresholds.
  • Analyzed how estimation errors affect the shape of apparent C-R functions.

Main Results:

  • Estimated C-R functions inaccurately depict risk as smoothly increasing below true thresholds.
  • This leads to overestimation of health benefits from reducing concentrations that do not impact health.
  • Ignored errors obscure true C-R function shapes and potential thresholds.

Conclusions:

  • Estimation errors in PM2.5 concentrations can distort the understanding of health risks.
  • Unrealistic predictions of health improvements may result from policy changes.
  • Focusing on changes in exposure distributions, not just average reductions, is crucial for accurate health impact assessment.