Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026
In vivo Imaging of Optic Nerve Fiber Integrity by Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Mice
Published on: July 22, 2014
Utility of volumetric contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating between common primary
Manijeh Zarghampour1, Daniel F Fouladi1, Ankur Pandey1
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background:
Differentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is usually achievable by MRI. However, in some cases with atypical imaging findings accurate diagnosis may be difficult.
Purpose:
To assess the diagnostic value of volumetric contrast-enhanced (CE) and volumetric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating between HCC, FNH, and HCA.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Subjects:
In all, 143 patients (206 lesions): 42 HCA (81 lesions), 51 FNH (65 lesions), and 50 HCC (60 lesions).
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5T MRI, T1 -T2 WI, DWI.
Assessment:
Patients underwent CE-MRI and DWI (b = 0, 750 mm2 /s). Volumetric assessment of lesions' contrast enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was performed with semiautomatic software after 3D image registration and segmentation by an observer and compared between three lesion groups. The diagnosis of lesions was based on histopathology, typical MRI findings, and/or follow-up.
Statistical Tests:
Independent t-test was used to compare parameters between two groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) between three groups, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to define under-curve area and optimal cutoff.
Results:
Mean values (±standard deviation) for HCC, FNH, and HCA, respectively, were: 1) arterial enhancement (%), 40.5 ± 13.2, 88.6 ± 32.6, 69.6 ± 25.1; 2) venous enhancement (%) 72.4 ± 22.1, 95.2 ± 30.9, 80.7 ± 30.6; and 3) ADC (10-6 mm2 /s) 1404.5 ± 168.1, 1413.4 ± 232.1, 1070.1 ± 232.1. ADC was the best differentiator of HCA from FNH (at 1211 × 10-6 mm2 /s; sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 71.7%) and arterial enhancement was the best differentiator of HCC from both HCA (at 48%; sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 80.5%) and FNH (at 52%; sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 85.4%). A combination of arterial enhancement and ADC (at 50% and 1227 × 10-6 mm2 /s) differentiated three types of tumors with high specificity (87.9%).
Data Conclusion:
Volumetric CE-MRI and volumetric DWI can help to differentiate between HCC, FNH, and HCA.
Level Of Evidence:
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1080-1090.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
01:15Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells
01:12Diffusion
01:21Diffusion
03:24Common Ion Effect
00:57Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...