Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
Reply to Caetano-Anollés et al. comment on "Empirical genome evolution models root the tree of life"
Ajith Harish1, Charles Kurland2
1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract:
We recently analyzed the robustness of competing evolution models developed to identify the root of the Tree of Life: 1) An empirical Sankoff parsimony (ESP) model (Harish and Kurland, 2017), which is a nonstationary and directional evolution model; and 2) An a priori ancestor (APA) model (Kim and Caetano-Anollés, 2011) that is a stationary and reversible evolution model. Both Bayesian model selection tests as well as maximum parsimony analyses demonstrate that the ESP model is, overwhelmingly, the better model. Moreover, we showed that the APA model is not only sensitive to artifacts, but also that the underlying assumptions are neither empirically grounded nor biologically realistic.
Related Concept Videos
Phylogenetic Trees
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Phylogenetic Trees
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes
Microbial Phylogeny

