Comparison of the Ahmed and Baerveldt glaucoma shunts with combined cataract extraction

To compare the surgical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification with either Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) or Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI).

Retrospective cohort study.

A total of 104 eyes that underwent combined phacoemulsification with either AGV (PhacoAGV; n = 57) or BGI (PhacoBGI; n = 47) implantation.

Failure was defined as uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP; <5 mm Hg, ≥18 mm Hg, or <20% reduction), additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complications, or progression to no-light-perception vision.

The PhacoAGV group was older (p = 0.03), had poorer baseline visual acuity (VA; p = 0.001), and had fewer previous glaucoma surgeries (p = 0.04). Both groups had similar baseline IOP (PhacoAGV: 26.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg; PhacoBGI: 25.7 ± 7.3; p = 0.66) and glaucoma medications (PhacoAGV: 3.8 ± 1.0; PhacoBGI: 3.6 ± 1.5; p = 0.54). At 2 years, failure rates were 44% in the PhacoAGV group and 23% in the PhacoBGI group (p = 0.02). Both groups had similar mean IOP reduction (PhacoAGV: 45%; PhacoBGI: 47%, p = 0.67) and medication use reduction (PhacoAGV: 47%; PhacoBGI: 58%, p = 0.38). The PhacoBGI group had higher IOP and medication use up to 1 month (p < 0.05). Both groups improved in VA from baseline (p < 0.05) and had similar overall complication rates (p = 0.31). The PhacoBGI group required more overall interventions (p < 0.0005).

This comparative study found no difference in IOP, glaucoma medications, or complication rates between PhacoAGV and PhacoBGI at 2 years, despite BGIs being implanted in patients at higher risk for failure. The PhacoAGV group had higher failure rates at 2 years. Both groups had significant improvements in VA due to removal of their cataracts. The PhacoBGI group required more interventions, but most of these were minor slit-lamp procedures.