Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

04:45
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
4.4K
Positive Surgical Margins in the 10 Most Common Solid Cancers
Ryan K Orosco1, Viridiana J Tapia1, Joseph A Califano1,2,3
1Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Scientific Reports
|April 11, 2018
Summary
Positive surgical margins (PSM) impact cancer treatment and outcomes. This study analyzed PSM rates across common US cancers, revealing varied trends over time, with some increasing and others declining.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Pathology
- Public Health
Background:
- Positive surgical margins (PSM) after cancer resection are linked to increased need for adjuvant therapies, impacting patient prognosis and healthcare costs.
- Understanding PSM rates is crucial for evaluating and improving surgical oncology practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare positive surgical margin (PSM) rates for the ten most common solid malignancies in the United States.
- To analyze temporal trends in PSM rates between 1998-2002 and 2008-2012.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for over 10 million patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2012.
- Focused on 6.5 million patients with available surgical margin status, comparing PSM rates across two distinct time periods.
Main Results:
- Positive surgical margin (PSM) prevalence varied significantly by tumor type and grade.
- Ovarian and prostate cancers exhibited the highest PSM rates in women and men, respectively. Oral cavity tumors showed the highest PSM rates for both genders.
- Declining PSM rates were observed for breast and lung cancers, while increases were noted for bladder, colon and rectum, and kidney cancers.
Conclusions:
- Significant variations in positive surgical margin (PSM) rates exist across common US solid tumors.
- Temporal trends indicate both improvements and worsening outcomes in achieving negative surgical margins for different cancer types.
- This analysis highlights areas for targeted intervention to enhance surgical oncology care and optimize patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Structures of Solids
18.2K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
18.2K
Common Ion Effect
47.0K
Compared with pure water, the solubility of an ionic compound is less in aqueous solutions containing a common ion (one also produced by dissolution of the ionic compound). This is an example of a phenomenon known as the common ion effect, which is a consequence of the law of mass action that may be explained using Le Châtelier’s principle. Consider the dissolution of silver iodide:
47.0K
Metallic Solids
20.9K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
20.9K
Margin of Error
7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Network Covalent Solids
16.2K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
Molecular and Ionic Solids
20.2K
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
20.2K

