Optimum Detection of Ureaplasma in Premature Infants

M Colleen Brand1, George T Mandy1, Sushrut Arora2

  • 1From the Texas Children's Hospital Newborn Center, Baylor College of Medicine Pediatrics, Newborn Section.

Insights

Early and late nasal and oral screening for Ureaplasma in premature infants is crucial. This approach optimizes detection of Ureaplasma spp., aiding timely antibiotic treatment to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Microbiology
  • Pediatric Pulmonology

Background:

  • Ureaplasma spp. is a significant risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants.
  • Early-life antibiotic treatment (azithromycin/clarithromycin) shows promise in reducing BPD in Ureaplasma-positive infants.
  • Reliable, non-invasive screening is essential to identify infants who would benefit from early antibiotic intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the optimal screening site and time for Ureaplasma spp. detection in premature infants (24-34 weeks gestation).
  • To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different sample types and collection timings for Ureaplasma screening.

Main Methods:

  • Collection of oral, nasal, gastric, and tracheal cultures from premature infants within the first 10 days of life (DOLs).
  • Immediate incubation of cultures in 10B broth media.
  • Verification of culture results and species identification using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

Main Results:

  • Ureaplasma spp. incidence was 47.6% (80/168 infants).
  • Nasal cultures demonstrated higher sensitivity than oral cultures (P=0.008), but combined oral and nasal screening is superior.
  • Late-onset cultures (DOL 7-10) were more sensitive than early-onset (DOL 1-2), but early screening is vital to avoid missing cases.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal detection of Ureaplasma spp. in premature infants requires sampling from both nasal and oral sites.
  • Cultures should be obtained both early (DOL 1-2) and later (DOL 7-10) within the first 10 days of life.
  • This comprehensive screening strategy maximizes the identification of Ureaplasma-positive infants for potential therapeutic intervention.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
324
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.6K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
668
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.5K