The under-appreciated and still under-investigated consequences of "supersized" access and closure
1Center for Structural and Congenital Heart Disease, Heart and Vascular Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center and Seton Hall Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Insights
Large bore femoral artery access may worsen vascular disease. Further research is crucial to understand the short- and long-term consequences of this common medical procedure.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Large bore arterial access is frequently used in cardiovascular interventions.
- Closure techniques for large bore femoral access are critical for patient outcomes.
- Potential for accelerated local vascular disease is a significant concern.
Discussion:
- The use of large bore access devices in the femoral artery may initiate or hasten the progression of vascular pathologies.
- Understanding the mechanisms by which this occurs is essential for risk mitigation.
- Clinical implications range from access site complications to systemic effects.
Key Insights:
- Large bore femoral access is linked to accelerated local vascular disease.
- The extent of short- and long-term effects requires comprehensive evaluation.
- Current closure methods may not fully mitigate these risks.
Outlook:
- Further investigation is needed to quantify the true impact of large bore access on vascular health.
- Development of novel closure devices and techniques may be warranted.
- Longitudinal studies will be vital to assess the long-term sequelae.
Abstract:
Large bore access and closure of the femoral artery has the potential to cause or accelerate local vascular disease The implications of accelerated disease could be substantial Further investigation is needed to assess the true short- and long-term effects.
Related Concept Videos
01:08The Availability Heuristic
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:41Social Traps
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
02:09Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
00:57Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.