Infants learn a rule predicated on the relation same but fail to simultaneously learn a rule predicated on the relation different
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
Published on: June 1, 2015
Jean-Rémy Hochmann1, Susan Carey2, Jacques Mehler3
1CNRS - Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod - UMR5304, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675 Bron, France.
Abstract:
In two experiments, we assessed whether infants are able to learn rules predicated on two abstract relations linked by negation: same and different (not same). In an anticipatory looking paradigm, the relation between successive colored geometrical shapes predicted the location where a puppet would appear next. In Experiment 1, 7-month-olds learned and generalized a rule predicated on the relation same, but not a rule predicated on the relation different. Similarly, in Experiment 2, 12-month-olds learned a rule predicated on the relation same-shape, but not a rule predicated on the relation different-shape. Comparing our data with that from previous experiments in the speech domain, we found no effect of age, modality or rule complexity. We conclude that, in the first year of life, infants already possess a representation of the abstract relation same, which serves as input to a rule. In contrast, we find no evidence that they represent the relation different.
Related Concept Videos
Exceptions to the Octet Rule
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule
The Aufbau Principle and Hund's Rule
Midpoint Rule
Trapezoidal Rule
Simpson's Rule I

