Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Market and organizational factors associated with hospital vertical integration into sub-acute care
Tory H Hogan1, Christy Harris Lemak, Larry R Hearld
1Tory H. Hogan, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Division of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus. E-mail: Hogan.323@osu.edu. Christy Harris Lemak, PhD, is Professor and Department Chair, Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Larry R. Hearld, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Bisakha P. Sen, PhD, is Professor, Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Jack R.C. Wheeler, PhD, is Professor Emeritus, Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Nir Menachemi, PhD, is Professor and Department Chair, Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Background:
Changes in payment models incentivize hospitals to vertically integrate into sub-acute care (SAC) services. Through vertical integration into SAC, hospitals have the potential to reduce the transaction costs associated with moving patients throughout the care continuum and reduce the likelihood that patients will be readmitted.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to examine the correlates of hospital vertical integration into SAC.
Methodology/Approach:
Using panel data of U.S. acute care hospitals (2008-2012), we conducted logit regression models to examine environmental and organizational factors associated with hospital vertical integration. Results are reported as average marginal effects.
Findings:
Among 3,775 unique hospitals (16,269 hospital-year observations), 25.7% vertically integrated into skilled nursing facilities during at least 1 year of the study period. One measure of complexity, the availability of skilled nursing facilities in a county (ME = -1.780, p < .001), was negatively associated with hospital vertical integration into SAC. Measures of munificence, percentage of the county population eligible for Medicare (ME = 0.018, p < .001) and rural geographic location (ME = 0.069, p < .001), were positively associated with hospital vertical integration into SAC. Dynamism, when measured as the change county population between 2008 and 2011 (ME = 1.19e-06, p < .001), was positively associated with hospital vertical integration into SAC. Organizational resources, when measured as swing beds (ME = 0.069, p < .001), were positively associated with hospital vertical integration into SAC. Organizational resources, when measured as investor owned (ME = -0.052, p < .1) and system affiliation (ME = -0.041, p < .1), were negatively associated with hospital vertical integration into SAC.
Practice Implications:
Hospital adaption to the changing health care landscape through vertical integration varies across market and organizational conditions. Current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement programs do not take these factors into consideration. Vertical integration strategy into SAC may be more appropriate under certain market conditions. Hospital leaders may consider how to best align their organization's SAC strategy with their operating environment.
More Related Videos
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
08:22The Application of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) in the Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: December 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Vertical Curve: Problem Solving
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics