Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Hydration of Cement01:24

Hydration of Cement

970
Hydration of cement is a chemical reaction between cement particles and water. This process occurs primarily through two mechanisms: through-solution and topochemical. In the through-solution process, anhydrous compounds dissolve into their constituents, hydrates form in the solution, and then precipitate from the supersaturated solution. The topochemical process involves solid-state reactions at the cement particle surface. The through-solution process dominates the topochemical process at the...
970
Soundness of Cement01:17

Soundness of Cement

586
The soundness of cement refers to the ability of cement paste to retain its volume after setting. Unsound cement can lead to expansion and structural damage due to the presence of free lime, magnesia, and calcium sulfate. Free lime hydrates very slowly, expanding and causing unsoundness, which is difficult to detect because it intercrystallizes with other compounds. Magnesia also reacts with water, forming crystals that can disrupt the cement's structure. Calcium sulfate can create...
586
Portland Cement01:21

Portland Cement

736
Portland cement is the essential binding ingredient in concrete, made from finely ground materials including lime, iron, silica, and alumina. Lime is derived primarily from limestone, marble, marl, seashells, and clays, which also supply iron and alumina, while silica is sourced from sand, chalk, and bauxite. Contemporary manufacturing of Portland cement is a significant source of carbon dioxide emissions, prompting research into reducing its content in concrete through alternative...
736
Fineness of Cement01:15

Fineness of Cement

531
The fineness of cement directly influences the rate of hydration, as the hydration begins at the surface of the cement particles. In addition to hydration, the fineness of cement is vital for various properties of concrete including workability, gypsum requirement, and long-term behavior. The fineness of cement is represented in terms of the specific surface of cement which is typically measured in square meters per kilogram, with several methods available for this determination.
Direct...
531
Strength of Cement01:20

Strength of Cement

539
Strength tests for cement are not performed directly on neat cement paste due to difficulty in obtaining consistent, reliable specimens. Instead, cement is typically tested in the form of cement-sand mortar.
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
539
Types of Cement I01:21

Types of Cement I

398
Portland cement comes in several types, each with distinct properties and applications based on their chemical composition and hydration characteristics:
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
398

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Most Common Organisms in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Survey of the International Orthopaedic Device Infection Network.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Avascular necrosis is associated with an increased risk of revision for infection compared to osteoarthritis in total hip replacement in younger patients: an analysis of 51,879 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2025
Same author

Data Resource Profile: The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).

International journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Patient and Surgical Factors Associated With Long-Term Mortality Outcomes Up to Fifteen Years After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

The Orthopaedic Device Infection Network: Building an Evidence Base for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Through International Collaboration.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

The ability of artificial intelligence tools to formulate orthopaedic clinical decisions in comparison to human clinicians: An analysis of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, and Bard.

Journal of orthopaedics·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Proplatelet Formation Dynamics of Mouse Fresh Bone Marrow Explants
05:58

Proplatelet Formation Dynamics of Mouse Fresh Bone Marrow Explants

Published on: May 20, 2021

2.9K

Bone preserving techniques for explanting the well-fixed cemented acetabular component.

Jarrad Stevens1, Gavin Macpherson1, Colin Howie1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Journal of Orthopaedics
|April 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Revision hip surgery requires careful removal of well-fixed cemented acetabular components. Understanding the biomechanical properties of bone cement and polyethylene aids in safe extraction, preserving bone stock for better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Acetabular componentCementExplantHip arthroplastyWell-fixed

More Related Videos

Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research
08:30

Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research

Published on: June 8, 2017

18.8K
Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Proplatelet Formation Dynamics of Mouse Fresh Bone Marrow Explants
05:58

Proplatelet Formation Dynamics of Mouse Fresh Bone Marrow Explants

Published on: May 20, 2021

2.9K
Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research
08:30

Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research

Published on: June 8, 2017

18.8K
Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Revision hip surgery presents challenges in removing well-fixed, cemented acetabular components.
  • Preserving bone stock and osseous integrity during implant removal is crucial.
  • The hardness of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement and polyethylene can complicate extraction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and review established and novel techniques for removing well-fixed cemented acetabular components.
  • To illustrate surgical methods using biomechanical properties of implant materials.
  • To provide guidance for revision arthroplasty surgeons facing complex implant removals.

Main Methods:

  • Collating and reviewing four techniques for cemented acetabular implant removal.
  • Utilizing biomechanical properties of bone cement and polyethylene in extraction strategies.
  • Illustrating techniques with photographic series on saw bones and clinical settings, supplemented by surgical video.

Main Results:

  • Techniques leverage different biomechanical principles for acetabular component extraction.
  • A novel technique simplifies a prior method, using tensile force for polyethylene cup removal.
  • The presented new technique is safe and reproducible for well-fixed cemented acetabular implants.

Conclusions:

  • Knowledge of PMMA cement and polyethylene biomechanics facilitates safe removal of cemented acetabular components.
  • Optimal removal technique selection depends on patient and implant-specific factors.
  • This review offers valuable insights for revision arthroplasty surgeons.