Relationship between the agonist activity of synthetic ligands of TRAIL-R2 and their cell surface binding modes

Neila Chekkat1, Caterina M Lombardo2,3, Cendrine Seguin1

  • 1Laboratoire de Conception et Application de Molécules Bioactives, UMR 7199 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France.

Oncotarget
|April 13, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Synthetic peptides targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL)-R2 show promise for cancer therapy. Their binding mode to cancer cells, influenced by receptor state, predicts pro-apoptotic activity, potentially guiding future TRAIL-based treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) is a potential cancer therapeutic agent inducing apoptosis in cancer cells.
  • Clinical trials of recombinant TRAIL and anti-TRAIL receptor antibodies showed limited efficacy, possibly due to cell-type-dependent responses and ligand-receptor interactions.
  • Factors like receptor oligomerization and glycosylation may influence TRAIL's binding mode and subsequent apoptotic signaling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the binding mode of synthetic TRAIL-R2 specific peptides and their pro-apoptotic activity.
  • To explore how cell-surface TRAIL-R2 characteristics influence the efficacy of TRAIL-based therapeutics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized synthetic divalent and monovalent peptides targeting TRAIL-R2.
  • Assessed pro-apoptotic activity on three cancer cell lines (BJAB, HCT116, Jurkat) sensitive to TRAIL.
  • Monitored cell-surface binding kinetics and receptor-ligand interactions using cross-linking experiments.

Main Results:

  • Divalent peptides exhibited high affinity binding to TRAIL-R2 on BJAB cells, inducing significant apoptosis.
  • Weak binding and no apoptosis induction were observed with the same peptides on HCT116 and Jurkat cells.
  • Cross-linking experiments suggested differences in TRAIL-R2 oligomerization states on cell surfaces contributed to varied responses.
  • Kinetic analysis indicated subtle differences in binding mechanisms for divalent peptides on BJAB cells.

Conclusions:

  • A correlation exists between the cell-surface binding mode of TRAIL-R2 peptides and their pro-apoptotic efficacy.
  • Cell-surface receptor characteristics, such as oligomerization state, significantly impact therapeutic response.
  • Characterizing ligand binding to cell-surface receptors is crucial for predicting the therapeutic potential of synthetic TRAIL-R2 ligands before clinical application.

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.2K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

8.9K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.6K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.2K
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:16

Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

Adrenergic agonists' structure-activity relationship (SAR) determines their selectivity and efficacy. These agonists comprise a phenylethylamine moiety with an aromatic ring and an ethylamine side chain.
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
3.9K
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:22

Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

Cholinergic agonists or cholinomimetics mimic the action of acetylcholine to stimulate the parasympathetic nervous system. They are categorized into direct-acting and indirect-acting agents. The direct-acting cholinergic drugs induce the parasympathetic response by directly binding to the muscarinic or nicotine receptors. In comparison, the indirect-acting cholinergic drugs prevent acetylcholine hydrolysis, indirectly contributing to the extended parasympathetic response.
The direct-acting...
2.2K