Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
Published on: March 27, 2019
What drives centralisation in cancer care?
Melvin J Kilsdonk1,2, Sabine Siesling1,2, Boukje A C van Dijk1,3
1Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, dept. of research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Centralizing cancer surgery in high-volume centers improved care. Regulations and scientific evidence drove this shift for esophageal, pancreatic, and bladder cancer surgeries in the Netherlands.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Services Research
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Centralization of cancer services aims to improve patient outcomes by concentrating care in high-volume centers.
- Despite evidence from the 1990s linking specialization and high surgical volumes to better outcomes, implementing centralization has been challenging globally.
- This study investigates the factors influencing the centralization of cancer services within the Netherlands.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the key factors driving the centralization of cancer surgery in the Netherlands.
- To analyze the timeline and impact of evidence, professional society actions, and regulations on centralization patterns.
- To understand the implementation process of specialized cancer care models.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of centralization patterns for three cancer types (esophagus, pancreas, bladder) known to benefit from high surgical caseloads.
- Utilized data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2000-2013) covering 8037, 4747, and 6362 surgical patients, respectively.
- Correlated timelines of centralization with the emergence of scientific evidence, medical society initiatives, and regulatory changes.
Main Results:
- A gradual increase in centralization for esophageal and pancreas cancer surgery was observed starting in 2005-2006, following international scientific evidence.
- Centralization milestones for bladder cancer surgery occurred in 2010 and 2013, preceding professional society guideline publications.
- Regulatory measures, specifically minimum volume requirements, appeared to be the most significant catalyst for centralization.
Conclusions:
- Scientific evidence linking surgical volume to patient outcomes initiated the centralization of cancer surgery in the Netherlands.
- Establishing evidence for organizational changes is crucial, but regulatory frameworks are essential for ensuring widespread adoption and implementation.
- A combination of strong evidence and supportive regulation is necessary for successful centralization of specialized cancer care.
Related Concept Videos
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Continuing Care
Standards of Care I

