Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of upper limb movements in children with Down's syndrome: A systematic review
Jamile Benite Palma Lopes1, Renata Calhes Franco de Moura1, Roberta Delasta Lazzari2
1Health Sciences Program, Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
Quantitative clinical methods for evaluating upper limb movement in children with Down syndrome lack standardization. Developing consistent protocols is crucial for reproducible results and effective treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Neuroscience
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Down syndrome is associated with motor impairments, particularly affecting upper limb function.
- Quantitative clinical methods are increasingly used to assess motor function in this population.
- Understanding current evaluation techniques is vital for improving clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review quantitative clinical methods for upper limb movement evaluation in children and adolescents with Down syndrome.
- To identify and describe the variables, protocols, motor function, and motor control assessments used.
- To highlight the need for standardized evaluation procedures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review was conducted.
- Searches were performed in PubMed, Scielo, BVS Bireme, and PEDro databases.
- Keywords included "upper limb," "Down syndrome," "EMG," "kinematics," and "motion analysis."
Main Results:
- 344 articles were initially identified, with five selected for the review.
- Significant heterogeneity was found in data collection, processing, and variable evaluation methods.
- No standardization was observed across the analyzed studies.
Conclusions:
- Kinematic evaluation is valuable but hampered by methodological inconsistencies.
- Lack of standardization limits clinical interpretation and reproducibility.
- Standardized upper limb movement protocols are essential for comparable results and informed treatment planning.
Abstract:
The aim of the present study was to perform a review of the literature on current quantitative clinical methods for the evaluation of upper limb movements in children and adolescents with Down syndrome, with a focus on describing the variables, protocols, motor function and motor control.
Methods:
A survey of PubMed, Scielo, BVS Bireme and PEDro databases using the following key words: upper limb and EMG and Down syndrome; upper limb and kinematics and Down syndrome; upper limb and motion analysis and Down syndrome; movement and upper limb and Down syndrome; upper limb and Down syndrome; reach and Down syndrome.
Results:
In all, 344 articles and five were selected to compose the present systematic review. No standardization was found among the studies analyzed with regard to data collection, data processing or procedures for the evaluation of the variables.
Conclusion:
A kinematic evaluation is effective for the discussion of the results, but methodological differences among the studies and inconsistent results exert a negative influence on clinical interpretations and the possibility of reproducibility. The standardization of an upper limb movement evaluation protocol using kinematic analysis is important, as it would provide the basis for comparable, reproducible results and facilitate the planning of treatment interventions.