Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Published on: August 9, 2016
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a multicenter study
Tae Kyu Kim1, Jun Ho Park2, Jeong Yeon Kim1
1Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, 445-170, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Although laparoscopic appendectomy has been widely performed since 1987, concerns over potential spillage of mucus into the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic manipulation have prevented the use of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for appendiceal mucocele. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term perioperative outcomes of LS for appendiceal mucocele.
Methods:
A retrospective review was performed to identify patients diagnosed with appendiceal mucocele based on their imaging studies and who underwent surgery at one of six Hallym-University-affiliated hospitals between January 2007 and June 2016. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:
A total of 96 patients were evaluated, of whom 58 underwent LS (LS group) and 38 underwent open surgery (OS; OS group). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. The operation time was similar in both groups (P = 0.399). Intraoperative rupture occurred in two patients in each group (no significant difference, P = 0.647). Time to flatus, time to soft food intake, and length of hospital stay were shorter in the LS group than in the OS group (2.4 vs. 3.2 days, P = 0.003; 3.6 vs. 4.5 days, P = 0.024; 6.5 vs. 8.8 days, P = 0.011, respectively). The rate of postoperative complications was similar between the groups (P = 0.786). Univariate analysis revealed that rupture of appendiceal mucocele was associated with white blood cell count > 10,000/µL (P = 0.032) but not with LS (P = 0.647).
Conclusions:
The results showed that LS is safe and feasible for the surgical treatment of appendiceal mucocele. An elevated WBC count was associated with a risk of appendiceal mucocele rupture.
Insights
Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a safe and effective treatment for appendiceal mucocele, showing shorter recovery times than open surgery. Elevated white blood cell count may indicate a higher risk of mucocele rupture.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Appendiceal mucocele treatment traditionally avoided laparoscopic surgery (LS) due to concerns about mucus spillage.
- Laparoscopic appendectomy is common, but its application to appendiceal mucocele remained limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of LS for appendiceal mucocele.
- To assess short-term perioperative outcomes of LS compared to open surgery (OS).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 96 patients diagnosed with appendiceal mucocele.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent LS (58) and OS (38).
- Analysis of demographics, surgical, and postoperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- LS and OS showed similar operation times and intraoperative rupture rates.
- LS group had significantly shorter time to flatus, soft food intake, and hospital stay.
- Postoperative complication rates were comparable between LS and OS groups.
- Appendiceal mucocele rupture was associated with elevated white blood cell count (>10,000/µL).
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible option for treating appendiceal mucocele.
- Elevated white blood cell count is a risk factor for appendiceal mucocele rupture.
- LS offers potential benefits in reduced recovery time for appendiceal mucocele patients.
More Related Videos
07:36Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
11:46Investigation of the Electrophysiological and Thermographic Safety Parameters of Surgical Energy Devices During Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
Published on: October 13, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Case Studies
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...