Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
The Risk of Adverse Events Related to Extended-Dwell Peripheral Intravenous Access
Sara Campagna1, Silvia Gonella2, Pietro Antonio Zerla3
11Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences,University of Torino,via Santena 5 bis,10126 Torino,Italy.
Abstract:
Midline catheters (MCs) may be useful to avoid repeated venipuncture in patients requiring prolonged intravenous infusions with limited adverse events (AEs). We analyzed 2 Italian hospital databases to ascertain the safety of MCs. Among 1,538 adult patients, 154 MC-related AEs (10%; 2.49 AEs per 1,000 MC days) were reported.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;875-877.
Insights
Midline catheters (MCs) offer a safe alternative to repeated venipuncture for prolonged IV infusions. Analysis of two Italian hospital databases revealed a low rate of MC-related adverse events, suggesting their utility in patient care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Infection Control
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Midline catheters (MCs) are increasingly used for extended intravenous (IV) therapy.
- They aim to reduce complications associated with frequent venipuncture.
- Assessing the safety profile of MCs is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with midline catheter use in a real-world hospital setting.
- To determine the rate of MC-related AEs per 1,000 catheter days.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of data from two Italian hospital databases.
- Inclusion of 1,538 adult patients who received midline catheters.
- Systematic recording and categorization of all MC-related adverse events.
Main Results:
- A total of 154 MC-related adverse events were reported among 1,538 patients.
- This represents an incidence of 10% of patients experiencing at least one AE.
- The overall rate of AEs was 2.49 per 1,000 MC days.
Conclusions:
- Midline catheters demonstrate a favorable safety profile for patients requiring prolonged intravenous infusions.
- The incidence of adverse events is relatively low, supporting their use as a viable alternative to repeated venipuncture.
- Further research can optimize MC utilization and minimize potential complications.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Integration of Synaptic Events
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

