Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement
Megan M Jack1, Jeremy C Peterson1, J P McGinnis2
1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Insights
Simultaneous placement of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes is safe and cost-effective. This approach reduces hospital stays and complication rates compared to separate procedures.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Gastroenterology
- Medical Device Placement
Background:
- Historical data suggest increased complications with combined VP shunt and PEG tube placement.
- VP shunt infections are a noted concern in combined procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes and costs of simultaneous versus separate VP shunt and PEG tube placement.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined surgical procedures.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 10 patients with simultaneous VP shunt and PEG tube placement.
- Comparison with 18 patients who underwent separate procedures.
- Hospital billing charges analyzed for cost comparison.
Main Results:
- Simultaneous placement group had a shorter average hospital stay (25 days vs. 43 days).
- No infections or shunt malfunctions observed in the simultaneous group.
- Significantly lower overall complication rates and substantial cost savings in the simultaneous group.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous VP shunt and PEG tube placement is safe, effective, and cost-efficient.
- Recommends considering single-stage placement for patients needing both devices.
Background:
Limited historical data suggest that concomitant placement of both a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is associated with an increased risk of complications, including VP shunt infections. Here we compare the outcomes and cost difference between 2 groups of patients, one in which a VP shunt and PEG tube were placed in the same operation and the other in which separate operations were performed.
Methods:
A total of 10 patients underwent simultaneous placement of a VP shunt and PEG tube. This group was compared with a group of 18 patients that underwent separate placements. Hospital billing charges were used to compare the total cost of the procedures in the 2 groups.
Results:
Eight of the 10 patients presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The average length of stay was 25 ± 2 days for the simultaneous procedure group and 43 ± 7 days for the separate procedures group. The average duration of follow-up was 12 ± 3 months after simultaneous placement. No patient in the simultaneous surgery group had signs of infection or shunt malfunction at last follow-up. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the simultaneous surgery group. A cost analysis demonstrated significant cost savings by completing both procedures in the same surgical procedure.
Conclusions:
Simultaneous placement of a PEG tube and VP shunt is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective. Thus, in patients requiring both a VP shunt and PEG tube, placement of both devices in a single surgical procedure should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Shunt Admittances
To model this effect, the method of images is employed. This method involves replacing the Earth with an image conductor that mirrors the original...
Survey Safety
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Self-Efficacy
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...

