Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some thoughts about genetics, differentiation, and malignancy.

H Harris

    Somatic Cell Genetics
    |November 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The contribution of transfusion to HCV infection in England.

    Epidemiology and infection·2003
    Same author

    Coordination and dehydrogenation of PH(3) by 23 transition metal ions in the gas phase: FTICR experiments and density functional interpretations.

    Inorganic chemistry·2002
    Same author

    Reversible inhibition of cellular respiration by nitric oxide in vascular inflammation.

    American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2001
    Same author

    Issues in implementing prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: results of a working conference.

    Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2001
    Same author

    Regulation of metallothionein II messenger ribonucleic acid measures exogenous estrogen receptor-beta activity in SAOS-2 and LNCaPLN3 cells.

    Endocrinology·2001
    Same author

    Sources of infection among persons with acute hepatitis A and no identified risk factors during a sustained community-wide outbreak.

    Pediatrics·2000
    Same journal

    Two-dimensional electrophoresis of peptides from human-CHO cell hybrids containing human chromosome 21.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    Same journal

    Secondary mutation resistant to 7-ketocholesterol rescues a sterol metabolic defect in amphotericin B-resistant Chinese hamster cell line.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    Same journal

    Expression of recessive Aprt- mutations in mouse CAK cells resulting from chromosome loss and duplication.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    Same journal

    Chromosome assignment of genes encoding the alpha and beta subunits of glycoprotein hormones in man and mouse.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    Same journal

    LPS-nonresponsive variants of mouse B cell lymphoma, 70Z/3: isolation and characterization.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    Same journal

    Assignment of gene(s) coding for antigen defined by monoclonal antibody 2B2.

    Somatic cell genetics·1983
    See all related articles

    This study explores if genetic or epigenetic factors drive cancer (malignancy). It questions the existence of conventional epigenetic mechanisms and proposes criteria for defining cancer states in cell fusion experiments.

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Molecular Biology
    • Genetics

    Background:

    • Cancer (malignancy) development is complex, involving genetic and epigenetic alterations.
    • The precise role and definition of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer remain debated.
    • Cell fusion experiments offer a unique model to study gene regulation and dominance in malignancy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the determinants of malignancy: genetic versus epigenetic mechanisms.
    • To critically evaluate the existence and definition of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer research.
    • To establish criteria for assessing dominance or recessiveness of the malignant state using cell fusion.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of genetic and epigenetic contributions to cancer.
    • Conceptual review and definition refinement of epigenetic mechanisms.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of cell fusion techniques to study malignant phenotypes.

    • Main Results:

    • The article presents arguments for both genetic and epigenetic roles in malignancy.
    • It challenges the conventional definition of epigenetic mechanisms, suggesting a need for re-evaluation.
    • Proposed criteria for dominance/recessiveness in cell fusion experiments are discussed.

    Conclusions:

    • Malignancy likely arises from a complex interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors.
    • A refined understanding and definition of epigenetic mechanisms are crucial for cancer research.
    • Clear criteria are needed to interpret dominance and recessiveness in cell fusion studies of cancer.