Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
Explicit Memories01:27

Explicit Memories

467
Explicit memories, also known as declarative memories, are consciously remembered, recalled, and reported. Studying for a chemistry exam involves material that will become part of explicit memory. There are two types of explicit memory: episodic and semantic.
Episodic memory contains information about personally experienced events and is reported as a story. An example of episodic memory is recalling a birthday celebration. This type of memory includes the what, where, and when of an event, as...
467
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

440
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
440
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.4K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

69.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
69.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K

How program evaluators use and learn to use rubrics to make evaluative reasoning explicit.

Krystin S R Martens1

  • 1Centre for Program Evaluation, Univerrsity of Melbourne, Australia; Verstehen Evaluation and Development, LLC, United States.

Evaluation and Program Planning
|April 17, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Seasoned evaluators use rubrics for program evaluation to determine merit and focus. They learn rubric skills informally through practice and collaboration, highlighting a need for formal training.

Keywords:
Evaluation-specific methodologyProgram evaluationResearch on evaluationRubrics

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
07:44

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
07:44

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Evaluation Science
  • Program Evaluation
  • Applied Research

Background:

  • Rubrics are essential tools for evaluators to synthesize evidence and values for determining merit, worth, or significance.
  • Existing guidance for rubric use in evaluation practice is limited.
  • Understanding how experienced evaluators utilize rubrics is crucial for advancing evaluation methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how seasoned evaluators use rubrics in their program evaluation practice.
  • To investigate the learning processes and skill development related to rubric utilization among expert evaluators.
  • To identify current challenges and opportunities for enhancing the application of rubrics in evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine experienced evaluators globally.
  • Qualitative data analysis was employed to identify themes in rubric usage and learning.
  • The study focused on evaluators with established experience in using rubrics.

Main Results:

  • Rubrics are critical for evaluators in making determinations and serve as frameworks to sharpen evaluation focus.
  • A significant lack of formal training channels for learning about rubrics was identified.
  • Evaluators predominantly acquire rubric skills through informal methods like trial and error and community engagement.

Conclusions:

  • Rubrics are integral to effective program evaluation practice, aiding in both judgment and focus.
  • There is a clear need for more structured training and resources to support evaluators in using rubrics.
  • Further research and training initiatives should aim to increase the understanding, application, and acceptance of rubrics in evaluation.