Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

09:30
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
Published on: September 13, 2018
10.0K
Sample collection and sample handling errors submitted to the transfusion error surveillance system, 2006 to 2015
Rachel Strauss1, Helen Downie2, Ann Wilson3
1Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Transfusion
|April 18, 2018
Summary
Transfusion errors in Canada show a decrease in "wrong blood in tube" events, but an increase in low-severity sample collection and handling errors. Further research is needed to prevent these transfusion safety issues.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Patient Safety
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Canadian transfusion-related errors are voluntarily reported to enhance transfusion safety.
- This analysis focuses on sample collection (SC) and sample handling (SH) errors from a national tracking system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in sample collection and sample handling errors in Canadian blood transfusions from 2006 to 2015.
- To investigate the impact of institutional policies and error detection mechanisms on transfusion error rates.
Main Methods:
- Extracted error data from 23 participating Canadian sites between 2006 and 2015.
- Calculated error rates, including "wrong blood in tube" (WBIT), based on samples received in the blood bank.
- Conducted a survey to gather information on institutional policies and error detection practices.
Main Results:
- Over 42,000 SC and 14,000 SH errors were reported.
- Low-severity and high-severity SC/SH errors increased from 2006 to 2015.
- The WBIT rate significantly decreased from 12 to 5.8 per 10,000 samples (p < 0.0001).
- Sites with error detection mechanisms, like second sample requirements, showed lower error rates.
Conclusions:
- While WBIT errors have declined, low-severity errors are increasing, possibly due to better reporting.
- There is significant site-to-site variability in WBIT rates.
- Further prevention studies are crucial to inform updated blood transfusion standards and eliminate errors.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Sample Handling
2.7K
Transportation of samples from the collection point to the laboratory, as well as storage and preservation techniques, are crucial for maintaining sample integrity and ensuring accurate and reliable test results.
Samples should be transported carefully from collection points to the laboratory. They should be properly sealed and clearly labeled to prevent cross-contamination. To preserve the sample integrity, optimal temperature conditions during transport are essential. This could involve using...
Samples should be transported carefully from collection points to the laboratory. They should be properly sealed and clearly labeled to prevent cross-contamination. To preserve the sample integrity, optimal temperature conditions during transport are essential. This could involve using...
2.7K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error
7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean
12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K

