Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Studying Surfactant Effects on Hydrate Crystallization at Oil-Water Interfaces Using a Low-Cost Integrated Modular Peltier Device
Published on: March 18, 2020
Dynamic Asphaltene-Stearic Acid Competition at the Oil-Water Interface
Bastian Sauerer1, Mikhail Stukan1, Jan Buiting2
1Schlumberger Dhahran Carbonate Research Center , Dhahran Techno Valley - KFUPM , P.O. Box 39011, Dammam/Doha Camp , Dhahran 31942 , Saudi Arabia.
This study reveals how natural surfactants like stearic acid and asphaltenes compete at oil-water interfaces, impacting fluid flow in oil recovery. Stearic acid initially dominates, but asphaltenes adsorb slower and bind stronger, influencing interfacial tension dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Petroleum Engineering
- Surface Chemistry
- Colloid Science
Background:
- Interfacial tension (IFT) is critical for fluid flow in oil production and recovery.
- Natural surfactants in crude oil, such as carboxylic acids and asphaltenes, significantly influence IFT.
- Understanding the competitive adsorption of these surfactants is key to optimizing oil recovery processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interfacial activity and competitive adsorption of carboxylic acids (modeled by stearic acid) and asphaltenes at toluene/water interfaces.
- To analyze the dynamic interfacial tension (IFT) behavior of these components in a water-in-oil system.
- To determine the influence of surfactant concentrations on IFT and adsorption kinetics.
Main Methods:
- Dynamic IFT measurements using water-in-oil pendant drops.
- Utilized stearic acid (SA) as a model for surface-active carboxylic acids.
- Varied concentrations of SA (0.1 to 2 mg KOH/g oil) and asphaltenes (10 to 100 ppm) in model oil-water systems.
- Applied Langmuir isotherm analysis and dynamic surface adsorption models.
Main Results:
- Stearic acid (SA) initially dictates surface pressure, while asphaltenes exhibit slow adsorption over time.
- Asphaltenes show a higher final surface pressure than SA individually, but mixtures result in lower combined pressures.
- Langmuir analysis indicates asphaltenes bind 200-250 times stronger than SA, despite SA dominating at high concentrations.
- Apparent diffusivity of asphaltenes is low, suggesting adsorption is barrier-controlled, possibly due to a dense SA layer repelling asphaltenes.
Conclusions:
- The competitive adsorption between SA and asphaltenes significantly impacts interfacial tension dynamics in oil-water systems.
- Asphaltenes possess stronger binding affinity but slower adsorption kinetics compared to SA.
- The findings provide insights into surfactant behavior in crude oil, relevant for enhanced oil recovery strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
Water: A Bronsted-Lowry Acid and Base
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Water and Mineral Acquisition
States of Water
Water freezes when the intermolecular forces are greater than the kinetic energy. Unlike most other substances, water is less dense in its solid state than in its liquid state. This is because each water molecule can form...

