Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

8.3K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.3K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.0K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.0K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.6K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.6K
Antibiotic Selection00:57

Antibiotic Selection

60.2K
Overview
60.2K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

42.9K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RNA helicase DDX5 alleviates UVB-induced skin DNA damage through RBM15/METTL14-mediated m<sup>6</sup>A modification.

Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology·2026
Same author

Ginsenoside Re Inhibits NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Depressive Mice by Promoting PINK1-Mediated Mitophagy.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2025
Same author

β-Nicotinamide mononucleotide blocks UVB-induced collagen reduction via regulation of ROS/MAPK/AP-1 and stimulation of mitochondrial proline biosynthesis.

Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology·2025
Same author

miR-1246-overexpressing exosomes improve UVB-induced photoaging by activating autophagy via suppressing GSK3β.

Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology·2024
Same author

Health of unpaid carers in Wales, UK: a population data linkage study.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Long Non-coding RNA H19-Overexpressing Exosomes Ameliorate UVB-Induced Photoaging by Upregulating SIRT1 Via Sponging miR-138.

Photochemistry and photobiology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

17.5K

Feature Genes Selection Using Supervised Locally Linear Embedding and Correlation Coefficient for Microarray

Jiucheng Xu1,2, Huiyu Mu1, Yun Wang1

  • 1College of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
|April 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel gene selection method, supervised locally linear embedding and Spearman

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy with Fluorescent Protein Preservation
08:47

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy with Fluorescent Protein Preservation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.4K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy with Fluorescent Protein Preservation
08:47

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy with Fluorescent Protein Preservation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.4K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Gene expression profiling is crucial for biological insights.
  • Existing feature selection methods often suffer from high time complexity and suboptimal classification performance.
  • Identifying highly discriminative feature genes is essential for accurate biological analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an effective feature selection method for gene expression data.
  • To improve classification performance in biological data analysis.
  • To address the limitations of existing feature selection techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel method named supervised locally linear embedding and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (SLLE-SC²).
  • Incorporated supervised locally linear embedding to leverage class label information for enhanced classification.
  • Utilized Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to identify and remove coexpression genes, refining feature selection.

Main Results:

  • The proposed SLLE-SC² method demonstrated validity and feasibility on four public tumor microarray datasets.
  • The integration of supervised locally linear embedding improved classification performance compared to existing methods.
  • Spearman's rank correlation coefficient effectively reduced redundancy by removing coexpression genes.

Conclusions:

  • The SLLE-SC² method offers a promising approach for feature gene selection in gene expression analysis.
  • This method enhances classification accuracy and efficiency in biological studies.
  • SLLE-SC² provides a robust tool for identifying key genes from complex genomic data.