Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus three-dimensional software: A comparative study of upper...

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Anatomy Learning
• Digital Health Technologies

Background:

• Traditional anatomy education relies heavily on cadaver prosections.
• Three-dimensional (3D) anatomy software presents a modern alternative for teaching complex anatomical structures.
• Limited research exists on the comparative effectiveness of 3D software versus prosections for musculoskeletal anatomy.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the effectiveness of 3D anatomy software versus cadaver prosections in teaching upper limb and musculoskeletal anatomy.
• To assess student performance on examinations after utilizing either learning method.
• To evaluate student satisfaction with each teaching approach.

Main Methods:

• Two groups of first-year medical students (n=72) were compared: one using cadaver prosections (n=40) and the other using 3D software (n=32).
• Both groups received four hours of lectures and four hours of laboratory work.
• An anonymous examination and questionnaire assessed performance and satisfaction.

Main Results:

• Students using 3D anatomy software demonstrated significantly better examination performance (mean 55.88±19.60) than those using prosections (mean 48±16.11; p=0.05).
• No significant difference in student satisfaction was observed between the 3D software and prosection groups (p=0.39).

Conclusions:

• 3D anatomy software is a valuable tool for teaching musculoskeletal anatomy, showing improved student outcomes.
• While effective, 3D software requires further research before integration into multimodal anatomy curricula.
• Current findings are specific to upper limb musculoskeletal anatomy and may not generalize to all anatomy subjects.