Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
Published on: May 9, 2016
Optimization of training periods for the estimation model of three-dimensional target positions using an external
Hiraku Iramina1,2, Mitsuhiro Nakamura3,4, Yusuke Iizuka2
1Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8530, Japan.
Background:
During therapeutic beam irradiation, an unvisualized three-dimensional (3D) target position should be estimated using an external surrogate with an estimation model. Training periods for the developed model with no additional imaging during beam irradiation were optimized using clinical data.
Methods:
Dual-source 4D-CBCT projection data for 20 lung cancer patients were used for validation. Each patient underwent one to three scans. The actual target positions of each scan were equally divided into two equal parts: one for the modeling and the other for the validating session. A quadratic target position estimation equation was constructed during the modeling session. Various training periods for the session-i.e., modeling periods (TM)-were employed: TM ∈ {5,10,15,25,35} [s]. First, the equation was used to estimate target positions in the validating session of the same scan (intra-scan estimations). Second, the equation was then used to estimate target positions in the validating session of another temporally different scan (inter-scan estimations). The baseline drift of the surrogate and target between scans was corrected. Various training periods for the baseline drift correction-i.e., correction periods (TCs)-were employed: TC ∈ {5,10,15; TC ≤ TM} [s]. Evaluations were conducted with and without the correction. The difference between the actual and estimated target positions was evaluated by the root-mean-square error (RMSE).
Results:
The range of mean respiratory period and 3D motion amplitude of the target was 2.4-13.0 s and 2.8-34.2 mm, respectively. On intra-scan estimation, the median 3D RMSE was within 1.5-2.1 mm, supported by previous studies. On inter-scan estimation, median elapsed time between scans was 10.1 min. All TMs exhibited 75th percentile 3D RMSEs of 5.0-6.4 mm due to baseline drift of the surrogate and the target. After the correction, those for each TMs fell by 1.4-2.3 mm. The median 3D RMSE for both the 10-s TM and the TC period was 2.4 mm, which plateaued when the two training periods exceeded 10 s.
Conclusions:
A widely-applicable estimation model for the 3D target positions during beam irradiation was developed. The optimal TM and TC for the model were both 10 s, to allow for more than one respiratory cycle.
Trial Registration:
UMIN000014825 . Registered: 11 August 2014.
Related Concept Videos
The Periodic Table
Periodic Classification of the Elements
Work Done on a System by External Force
In the presence of a non-conservative opposing force, like friction, some part of the work done...
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Effective Value of a Periodic Waveform
The effective value of a periodic current represents the direct current (DC) that conveys the same average power to a resistor as the periodic current itself. This concept is crucial when assessing AC circuits. To determine the...
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements

