Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion03:48

Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion

31.4K
Although gaseous molecules travel at tremendous speeds (hundreds of meters per second), they collide with other gaseous molecules and travel in many different directions before reaching the desired target. At room temperature, a gaseous molecule will experience billions of collisions per second. The mean free path is the average distance a molecule travels between collisions. The mean free path increases with decreasing pressure; in general, the mean free path for a gaseous molecule will be...
31.4K
Kinetic Molecular Theory and Gas Laws Explain Properties of Gas Molecules02:34

Kinetic Molecular Theory and Gas Laws Explain Properties of Gas Molecules

37.6K
The test of the kinetic molecular theory (KMT) and its postulates is its ability to explain and describe the behavior of a gas. The various gas laws (Boyle’s, Charles’s, Gay-Lussac’s, Avogadro’s, and Dalton’s laws) can be derived from the assumptions of the KMT, which have led chemists to believe that the assumptions of the theory accurately represent the properties of gas molecules.
37.6K
Molecules and Compounds02:38

Molecules and Compounds

69.4K
Atoms and Molecules
69.4K
Molecular and Ionic Solids02:54

Molecular and Ionic Solids

20.2K
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
20.2K
Molecular Orbital Theory I02:35

Molecular Orbital Theory I

47.8K
Overview of Molecular Orbital Theory
47.8K
Molecular Orbital Theory II03:51

Molecular Orbital Theory II

27.7K
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accelerated Combinatorial Drug Design for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Resistance through Seeded Multisite λ-Dynamics.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Sampling the Grand Canonical Ensemble with Multisite λ Dynamics.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Correction to "Identifying Artifacts from Large Library Docking".

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Simultaneous Construction of Free Energy Surfaces via Multisite λ Dynamics and Umbrella Sampling.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Autobiography of Charles L. Brooks III.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Core Flipping in Lead Optimization: Rank Ordering Using λ-Dynamics.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

5.4K

Molecular interactions between single layered MoS2 and biological molecules.

Minyu Xiao1, Shuai Wei1, Yaoxin Li1

  • 1Department of Chemistry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , USA .

Chemical Science
|April 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Researchers studied how designed peptides interact with molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) surfaces. Unlike with graphene, aromatic residues showed weak binding, while charged amino acids promoted a standing orientation, enabling control over peptide positioning.

More Related Videos

Combining Single-molecule Manipulation and Imaging for the Study of Protein-DNA Interactions
14:43

Combining Single-molecule Manipulation and Imaging for the Study of Protein-DNA Interactions

Published on: August 27, 2014

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Advanced Single-Molecule Techniques for Investigating Telomeric Protein-DNA Interactions
11:21

Author Spotlight: Advanced Single-Molecule Techniques for Investigating Telomeric Protein-DNA Interactions

Published on: August 30, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

5.4K
Combining Single-molecule Manipulation and Imaging for the Study of Protein-DNA Interactions
14:43

Combining Single-molecule Manipulation and Imaging for the Study of Protein-DNA Interactions

Published on: August 27, 2014

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Advanced Single-Molecule Techniques for Investigating Telomeric Protein-DNA Interactions
11:21

Author Spotlight: Advanced Single-Molecule Techniques for Investigating Telomeric Protein-DNA Interactions

Published on: August 30, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Surface Chemistry
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Two-dimensional (2D) materials like molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) show promise for advanced sensors due to high sensitivity and selectivity.
  • Understanding molecular interactions at the 2D material-analyte interface is crucial for developing high-performance sensors.
  • 2D materials extensively interact with biological molecules, making interfacial studies vital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the molecular interactions between de novo designed alpha-helical peptides and monolayer MoS2.
  • To compare peptide-MoS2 interactions with known peptide-graphene interactions.
  • To explore methods for controlling peptide orientation on MoS2 surfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized molecular dynamics simulations to study peptide-MoS2 interactions.
  • Validated simulation data against experimental findings.
  • Performed site-specific mutations on peptides to analyze their effect on interfacial interactions.

Main Results:

  • Peptide aromatic residues exhibit weak interactions with the MoS2 surface, unlike their behavior with graphene.
  • Charged amino acids play a key role in orienting peptides in a standing-up configuration on MoS2.
  • Site-specific peptide mutations effectively mediated MoS2 interactions and controlled peptide orientation.

Conclusions:

  • Peptide-MoS2 interfacial interactions differ significantly from peptide-graphene interactions, particularly regarding aromatic residue binding.
  • Charged amino acids are critical for achieving specific peptide orientations on MoS2 surfaces.
  • The findings provide a pathway for rationally designing peptide-MoS2 interfaces for tailored sensor applications.