Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low back pain: risk evaluation and preplacement screening.

J S Himmelstein1, G B Andersson

  • 1Occupational Health Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01605.

Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors influencing the cost of chronic low back injuries: An analysis of data from independent medical examinations.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
Same author

Radiographic and histologic assessment of calcium sulfate in experimental animal models and clinical use as a resorbable bone-graft substitute, a bone-graft expander, and a method for local antibiotic delivery. One institution's experience.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2001
Same author

A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery.

Spine·2001
Same author

Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.

Spine·2001
Same author

Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same author

The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Spine·2001

Predicting low back pain in asymptomatic individuals is challenging due to technical, ethical, and legal issues with current screening methods. Future computer models may offer better risk prediction, but careful ethical considerations are crucial.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Current screening methods for predicting low back pain and disability in asymptomatic populations have significant limitations.
  • These limitations include technical deficiencies in sensitivity and specificity, as well as ethical and legal concerns regarding discrimination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the technical, ethical, and legal limitations of existing methods for predicting low back pain and disability.
  • To explore potential future advancements in predictive modeling for low back pain risk.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing predictive tests for low back pain, including past history and muscle strength testing.
  • Analysis of the technical accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) and reliability of these tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the legal and ethical implications, particularly concerning potential discrimination.

    • Main Results:

    • No current predictive tests demonstrate sufficient sensitivity or specificity for routine use.
    • Past history of low back pain lacks reliability and specificity; muscle strength testing faces challenges in program design and potential discrimination.
    • Existing methods pose risks of age, gender, and ethnic discrimination, and ethical concerns arise depending on how data is used.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing methods for predicting low back pain are technically inadequate and carry significant legal and ethical risks.
    • Future development of computer-assisted multivariate models may improve prediction accuracy.
    • Ethical implementation is paramount, focusing on safe job placement rather than solely reducing employer liability.