Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Origami Inspired Self-assembly of Patterned and Reconfigurable Particles
Published on: February 4, 2013
Core networks and their reconfiguration patterns across cognitive loads.
Nianming Zuo1,2,3, Zhengyi Yang1,2, Yong Liu1,2,4,3
1Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
The frontoparietal network (FPN) and default mode network (DMN) show distinct patterns during working memory (WM) tasks. Intensive brain network reconfiguration across cognitive loads indicates poorer WM performance.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Brain Imaging
Background:
- Cognitively demanding tasks engage distributed brain networks.
- Understanding core network configuration and reconfiguration across cognitive loads is crucial.
- The relationship between network dynamics and cognitive task performance needs further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the configuration and reconfiguration patterns of core brain networks during varying cognitive loads.
- To determine if these network reconfiguration patterns predict cognitive task performance, specifically working memory capacity.
- To differentiate the roles and dynamic changes of the frontoparietal network (FPN) and default mode network (DMN) across cognitive demands.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 448 subjects.
- Examination of brain activity during resting state and N-back working memory (WM) tasks with varying cognitive loads (0-back and 2-back).
- Discrimination of core brain networks based on functional interaction strength and connection flexibility.
Main Results:
- The frontoparietal network (FPN) and default mode network (DMN) were identified as core networks.
- Both FPN and DMN showed strengthened internal connections at low cognitive load (0-back) compared to rest.
- Increased network reconfiguration across cognitive loads correlated with poorer working memory performance.
Conclusions:
- The FPN and DMN exhibit distinct roles and reconfiguration patterns under cognitive load.
- Dynamic changes in brain network configuration are linked to cognitive performance.
- Brain network reconfiguration patterns offer a potential biomarker for evaluating and predicting cognitive capabilities, such as working memory performance.
More Related Videos
04:41Utilizing a Reconfigurable Maze System to Enhance the Reproducibility of Spatial Navigation Tests in Rodents
Published on: December 2, 2022
08:42Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Related Concept Videos
The Nucleosome Core Particle
The paradox
Nucleosomes, paradoxically, perform two opposite functions simultaneously. On the one hand, their main responsibility is to protect the delicate DNA strands from physical damage and help achieve a higher compaction ratio. While on the other hand, they must allow polymerase enzymes to access DNA...
The Nucleosome Core Particle
Nucleosomes, paradoxically, perform two opposite functions simultaneously. On the one hand, their primary aim is to protect the delicate DNA strands from physical damage and help achieve a higher compaction ratio. On the other hand, they must allow polymerase enzymes to access histone-bound DNA during...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Cognitive Dissonance
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Fixed Action Patterns