Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
Effect of intravascular contrast agent on diffusion and perfusion fraction coefficients in the peripheral zone and
Yousef Mazaheri1, Andreas M Hötker2, Amita Shukla-Dave1
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Purpose:
To determine whether water diffusion and the perfusion fraction coefficients in prostate peripheral zone (PZ) and prostate cancer (PCa) are affected by intravenous contrast injection and explore the potential mechanism behind previously reported differences between pre- and post-contrast ADC values.
Methods:
Our institutional review board waived informed consent for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study, which included 32 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 47-77 years) with biopsy-proven, untreated PCa who underwent 3-Tesla MRI, including DW-MRI at b-values 0, 400, 700, 1000 s/mm2 before and after gadolinium injection. For regions of interest (ROIs) in presumed benign PZ and PZ PCa, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), perfusion fraction f, and diffusion coefficient D were estimated voxel-wise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were estimated. Pre- and post-contrast measurements were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
In PZ, f (P = 0.002) was significantly higher on post-contrast imaging than on pre-contrast imaging, but ADC and D values did not change significantly (P = 0.562 and 0.295 respectively). In PCa, all parameters differed significantly between post-contrast and pre-contrast imaging (P < 0.0001 for ADC, P = 0.0084 for D, and P = 0.029 for f). On post-contrast imaging, SNR was not significantly different in PZ (P = 0.260) but was significantly lower in PCa (P < 0.0001); CNR did not change significantly (P = 0.059).
Conclusion:
After contrast injection, ADC and D declined significantly in PCa only, while f increased significantly in both PCa and PZ. Pre- and post-contrast diffusion parameters cannot be used interchangeably for diagnostic purposes that require quantitative diffusion estimates.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Diffusion
Hybrid Zones
Coefficient of Variation
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...

