Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.

H R Silvers1

  • 1Mercy Hospital, Buffalo, New York.

Neurosurgery
|May 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microlumbar discectomy offers superior outcomes compared to standard discectomy for herniated discs, showing higher success rates and faster recovery. This surgical approach is more cost-effective and leads to better patient results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lumbar microdiscectomy in the elderly patient.

British journal of neurosurgery·1997
Same author

Day surgery for cervical microdiscectomy: is it safe and effective?

Journal of spinal disorders·1996
Same author

Lumbar disc excisions in patients under the age of 21 years.

Spine·1994
Same author

Lumbar diskectomy for recurrent disk herniation.

Journal of spinal disorders·1994
Same author

Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.

Journal of neurosurgery·1993
Same author

Lumbar percutaneous facet rhizotomy.

Spine·1990

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Orthopedic Surgery

Background:

  • Standard discectomy is a common surgical treatment for herniated discs.
  • Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness of different surgical techniques are critical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical results and cost-effectiveness of microlumbar discectomy versus standard discectomy.
  • To evaluate the impact of secondary gain on surgical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of 270 patients undergoing standard discectomy and 270 patients undergoing microlumbar discectomy.
  • All patients presented with back and leg pain, positive clinical findings, and myelographic evidence of disc herniation.

Main Results:

  • Microlumbar discectomy demonstrated a 98% success rate versus 95% for standard discectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Excellent results were achieved in 95% of microlumbar discectomy patients compared to 89% in the standard group.
  • Microsurgical patients had shorter hospital stays (3.7 vs. 7.1 days) and quicker return to work.

    • Conclusions:

    • Microlumbar discectomy is superior to standard discectomy in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
    • Surgical technique significantly impacts patient recovery and overall success rates.
    • Secondary gain had minimal impact on outcomes regardless of the procedure used.