Towards a core outcome set for hemorrhoidal disease-a systematic review of outcomes reported in literature
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
R R van Tol1, E van Zwietering1, J Kleijnen2
1Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Insights
This study highlights the inconsistent outcomes reported in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) research. Standardizing outcome definitions is crucial for comparing treatment effectiveness in clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Medical research methodology
- Clinical trial design
- Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) management
Background:
- Published literature on hemorrhoidal disease (HD) treatment lacks uniform outcome definitions.
- This heterogeneity hinders transparency and comparability of study results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically identify and list the diverse outcomes utilized in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) studies.
- To establish a foundation for developing a core outcome set (COS) for HD research.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane for interventional studies on adult HD patients.
- Independent review of eligible studies by two authors to extract reported outcomes.
- Categorization of identified outcomes using the OMERACT filter 2.0 framework.
Main Results:
- 34 studies (RCTs and prospective observational) yielded 59 distinct outcome types.
- Commonly reported outcomes included pain (91%), blood loss (94%), prolapse (71%), and incontinence (56%).
- Significant variation in outcome definitions, with many lacking clear definitions.
Conclusions:
- Substantial heterogeneity exists in outcome reporting for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) studies.
- An overview of reported outcomes was generated, identifying key outcomes for a future core outcome set (COS).
Purpose:
Previously published literature regarding treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) revealed a lack of uniform defined outcomes. These differences between outcomes among studies limit transparency and lead to incomparability of results. The aim of this study was to systematically list the types of outcomes used in HD studies. This list will be used to develop a core outcome set.
Methods:
We searched Medline (Pubmed), Embase (OVID), and Cochrane for interventional studies for adult patients with HD. Two authors independently identified and reviewed eligible studies. This resulted in a list of outcomes reported by each clinical trial. All outcomes were categorized using the conceptual framework OMERACT filter 2.0.
Results:
A total of 34 randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies were included in this study. A total of 59 different types of outcomes were identified. On average, 5.8 different outcomes (range 2-8) were used per study. The outcomes were structured into three core areas and10 ten domains. The most commonly reported core area was pathophysiological manifestations including the domain symptoms, complications, and recurrence. The most frequently reported outcomes were pain (91%), blood loss (94%), prolapse (71%), and incontinence (56%). There was a high variation in definitions of the common outcomes. And often there was no definition at all.
Conclusion:
This study shows a substantial heterogeneity in the types of outcomes in HD studies. We provided an overview of the types of outcomes reported in HD studies and identified a list of potentially relevant outcomes required for the development of a COS.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
The Nucleosome Core Particle
The paradox
Nucleosomes, paradoxically, perform two opposite functions simultaneously. On the one hand, their main responsibility is to protect the delicate DNA strands from physical damage and help achieve a higher compaction ratio. While on the other hand, they must allow polymerase enzymes to access DNA...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview

